English Witness to their darkest hour
by P Scrivener
Athelney £10.94. pp174
ISBN9781903313046
http://www.athelney.org/
English witness to their darkest hour is a compendium of experiences and insights from ordinary people and some honourable commentators in the media who speak for them.
It is not so much controversial as shocking: but not shocking in the conventional sense of, say, porn on TV, but the revelation of a situation that is not officially recognised - the move to an oppressive, totalitarian state and what that means to people in practice.
Many innocent readers will be moved to sadness and despair by the impact of so many examples of injustice and official cruelty. The oppressors, the elites, are based not on birth, blood or land but expressing the correct ideological thoughts and any who say the wrong thing have their career publicly destroyed like genome scientist James Watson or the unsophisticated media creation Jade Goody in a media show trial as they are driven out of the elite and publicly to keep others in line. Their attitude grows out of prejudice against the English and in favour of ethnic minorities.
The English are usually accused of perpetrating evils like colonialism, racism, imperialism on other people but author Pat Scrivener shows with examples that that is what the authorities are doing to the English. The book is permeated with a sense of anxiety for the future, of not being allowed to speak against the abuses by the authorities. This book has to speak for itself as no mere description would give the real sense of it. There is no appropriate genre for contemporary revelation.
From the Author’s note the pervading sense of fear in the country is revealed. Her daughter, ”then ten, begged me not to write this book. She did not want to lose me to Labour’s racist regime” and this sets the tone for an Orwellian journey. How did it start?
The late Lord Deramore writes in the foreword that in 1945 with the election of Atlee we got our first statist government: “...in 1911, we were ruled by a democratic Government elected by a smaller franchise, today we have an autocratic government elected by a much larger franchise.”
Leading newspaper columnists like Richard Littlejohn: ”From day one - or Year Zero as I christened it in the Mail back in 1997 - Labour has set out to destroy England as we knew it.
While the Welsh and the Scots have been given their own parliaments and the IRA encouraged to take over Northern Ireland, the English have been subjugated, abused and ignored.
Mass immigration - legal and illegal - has transformed parts of England into foreign countries. State control as often is accompanied by lawlessness. In the chapter on Violent Crime Theodore Dalrymple tells how “surgeons” at the hospital he worked at “grow experienced in the treatment of gunshot wounds, when a few years ago they had no experience at all” and Peter Hitchins : “How much longer are the British going to put up with the way they are being ignored by those who claim to be in charge of the country? ...crime and disorder are out of control. But the safe, wealthy elite scornfully dismiss people such as me as alarmists”. He has had letters from people all over the country who are “baffled, afraid, dispirited and angry.” This book is part of ceasing to put up with it.
Labour MP Frank Field compares it with Stalin's forced migration in the Ukraine. Entire neighborhoods are being ethnically cleansed - and it's the English who are getting out of town.”
There are quotes from English people who are so broken down by the ruling elites that they guiltily explain they are not racist even when they are the victims of assault.
They have learnt from experience how dishonest are the media who promote the ideology that English people are racist while ethnic minorities are victims: a Daily Telegraph report of a woman who had been assaulted by Black schoolgirls on a bus and had a bone knocked through the skin of an arm. The paper commented: ”She maintains she is not a racist.” An anonymous remark from a TV documentary on “hate crime” from March 2001: “It portrayed racism as a purely White on Black activity. The subtle way the camera kept panning to a flag of St.George - which could have been in any innocent setting or one set up for the programme - forced a connection between racism and the flag.”
On oppression we hear from “Steve” “I find myself waiting in long queues in the post office to watch with amazement as asylum seekers and immigrants get their own counter. I see discrimination justified by liberals and lefties who believe special interest groups for ethnics are not divisive but also necessary, but if one suggests a special interest for whites its classed as racist or imperialist.”
This highlights the underlying difficulty. The elites are prejudiced against us and in favour of the ”ethnics” and this is how it translates into practice.
A dangerous side to this is highlighted in “National Security.” Phillip Johnston wrote in the Daily Telegraph after 9/11" Britain not only lets in people who supports terrorists but also often thwarted efforts to extradite suspected terrorists. More than half a dozen governments had filed protests with the Foreign Office about their presence...Egypt denounced Britain for” protecting killers.”
Former Conservative transport Minister with responsibility for the Channel Tunnel, Sir David Mitchell:” I’m at a loss to understand why the government doesn’t take effective action to stop illegal immigrants using the chunnel”.
The UK frontier is effectively at Calais he explained ...It’s a dereliction of duty to exercise immigration controls at the front door of the tunnel but and turn a blind eye to those who walk in by the side door.” They don’t want to. They are surrendering us to Eurabia.
Under Conquest and Imperialism Phillip Seddon writes” There can be few worse punishments for the young than to be taught to despise their own heritage, or at best that it is only one of many equal options. Herein also lies the poor performance of Luton as a whole in nation-wide school league tables...” This was from “The Popular Press” as many are from internet groups so this recognition of the real situation is spreading. It is easy to see why they want to get the internet under their control.
An exemplar of the chapter on Oppression is Jim of an internet newsgroup: “A man in Portsmouth was fined for remonstrating with Muslims who were openly celebrating the anniversary of 9/22. If he had not changed his plea to guilty to race hatred he was told he could got to jail. This man could not speak the truth.”
The editor adds an infamous example from Liverpool in 1999 when a 78 year-old was arrested and charged with criminal damage for posting UKIP posters and writing “Don’t forget the 1945 war” and “Free speech for England.” Because he had referred to England it was classed as “racially aggravated.”
These are the shocking cases reported in the media and so devoid of common sense they are described as “Political Correctness gone mad.” What P. Scrivener has done is take what whites are accused of doing to ethnic minorities and show that in reality the authorities are doing it to the English. This book heralds a re-learning curve.
A big shock is the penultimate chapter that deals with, wait for it, the genocide of the English! Dr. Anthony Daniels:”One obvious explanation (of the increase in TB in the Western world) makes officials uneasy that there has been a virtual conspiracy of silence about it.
The explanation is the vast population movement from areas of high prevalence of the disease such as Africa and Asia, to areas of much lower prevalence , such as Western Europe and North America.” An explanation from a TB in March 2003. “...includes the deliberate importation of diseases by refusing to screen incomers, which kill members of the British Community, such as AIDS/HIV, hepatitus, TB, etc. It also includes the deliberate importation of individuals from communities which have a higher violent crime rate than the British Community, thus increasing the death rate among the British.”
Mog states: "Just look at the abortion business. Killing English babies and then complaining we are under-populated and need to import immigrants. I really see something sinister.”
The sense of injustice people feel is here. Gayle Hall had a letter in the Sunday Telegraph "I was deeply upset to read about asylum seekers receiving fertility treatment on the NHS. As a British citizen and taxpayer , I was refused treatment as my local authority refused to pay".
The final chapter brings us back down with who is to blame. Like most reasonable people she finds culpability with the dominant ideological elites who act against the interests of the English not the immigrants who are behaving naturally in looking after their own interests.
But this eclectic and electric book details the reality. The Utopian project requires everything to be used as propaganda, social engineering and legal coercion as people have to be moulded or coerced into the future state - the basis of the totalitarian regimes of the last century as seen in Soviet Russia, Mao's China, Nazi Germany and Cambodia under Pol Pot.
This entails discrimination in favouror ethnics and discrimination against the English in their own country by their elected representatives. This will shock many who are not aware of what is happening because media propaganda has confused them.
Friday 26 December 2008
Monday 8 December 2008
Police Torture a Political Prisoner
On 18 November 2008 a copy of a BNP members list was published on the internet, and thus began a train of events that is destined to be one of history’s turning points. It revealed to a trusting public what the authorities are really like. These decent people who are supposed to be looking after our interests now stand exposed as totalitarians who will do anything, however oppressive and tyrannical, to silence dissent.
Innocent members of the public will be surprised at how oppressed the British people are unless they remain quiescent and only do permitted activities like watch telly, support sports teams and go to bars. If they dare speak out or campaign against certain injustices they will be persecuted and even brutalised.
There are many in this country who sincerely believe in freedom and democracy. They frequently gravitate towards the easily-occupied “moral high ground” of condemning racism by whites. But they rarely comprehend that a totalitarian, undemocratic structure has been created to oppress whites. Do they ever stop to think that in the home of the Mother of Parliaments, the Rule of Law and representative democracy the police would torture a political prisoner?
There was even a thinly-veiled incitement to violence from the established media. On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, and in mock-worried tones:-
I’m worried about the 12,000 BNP members whose names and addresses have been leaked on the internet. I pray their details don’t fall into the hands of any of those black radical groups known to take a very dim view of white neo-Nazis. It would be truly awful if anything nasty happened to these nice people wouldn’t it?
In part his wish was realised. In Cheltenham, widow Natalia Colthurst received six threatening calls in which she was asked her name and why she supports the BNP. The caller warned, “We know where you live”. The 72-year-old, who lives in Whaddon Road, was advised by bereavement councillors to join social groups when her husband died in 2006. The former language teacher said after two BNP meetings early last year, she and her elderly friend realised it wasn’t for them and broke with the party.
The house of George and June Papps on Lysons Avenue, Gloucester, was vandalised, with graffiti saying “BNP Scum”, scrawled on a wall. The couple, aged 79 and 77, are both recovering from cancer and said they were singled-out because their son, who has moved away, is a member.
Another eye-opener for trusting members of the public is British bobbies torturing a political prisoner, BNP member Andrew Tierney. He was one of thirteen BNP activists arrested by Merseyside police, from whom fingerprints and DNA were taken to be added to the National Database. The media have not covered this but from the BNP‘s own website and from personal interviews I discovered the reality of what happened.
The victim related: “They then somehow applied a tremendous pressure behind my ears, inflicting great pain. They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen, he was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints. They put a deep gash in his forehead in the process.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab,” he continued.
The episode lasted at least a quarter of an hour, and the victim was left shaken and in pain. Photographs taken shortly afterwards clearly showed bleeding from wounds sustained behind both his ears. They applied some kind of pressure to his arms and his side, once again leaving considerable bruising, evidenced again by photographs taken shortly after his release.
This is similar to how the Americans torture political prisoners at Guantanamo Bay:-
“The military police inflicted so much pain, Mr Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose so hard he thought it would break.”
Here is a technical analysis of what they did to the political prisoner in Liverpool: they were applying pressure to the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra. It’s taught as a pressure point in both Karate and Ju-jitsu, either to strike at, or press, to break a grip or grapple.
You may cause the atlanto-occipital joint to cavitate by doing this which is like cracking the knuckles, except that as this done at the base of the skull it will probably frighten anyone who doesn’t understand what is going on. They might think their neck has been broken!
“They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen. He was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints.
Pulling the head back forcefully can and will break the neck. You will either die very quickly or become paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair for life or tetraplegic like Christopher Reeve, depending on the location of the fracture and how far any bone fragments from the vertical lamina enter the spinal cord itself. Attacking the trachea in the manner described can also be fatal, but a fatality is more likely to occur from a violent blow rather than pressure. It’s not so much the collapse of the trachea but disruption to the baro receptors located at the bifurcation of the carotid artery. These control blood pressure to the brain and, if sufficiently traumatised, can shut off blood supply to the brain permanently.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab.”
Again, very dangerous. It depends exactly where the pressure is applied, but a broken neck or avulsion of the dens could occur. The dens is a little bit of bone about the size of the last phalange of your little finger that acts as a pivot for the heads rotation. It is sometimes avulsed or pulled off in whiplash victims. It sits just posterior to the brain stem, in the area where breathing is regulated, so you don’t want a broken dens shoved through that particular area!”
This action from a Police Officer can only be justified in a desperate one-on-one struggle with a bigger and stronger opponent, but is not appropriate for a custody suite. Either the Police have a lack of understanding of the potential dangers of their action, in which case their training needs to be revised, or they were deliberately reckless. It is easy to see how people can be killed in police custody.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Deaths_in_UK_Police_Custody
In addition a 70 year-old man, Arnold Briddle, was refused his prescribed medication for third-stage renal failure. Merseyside Police could have murdered two people quite easily that night!
This all started on Saturday the 22nd of November when Liverpool’s political police arrested the thirteen BNP members for distributing Racism Cuts Both Ways (PDF) leaflets, which is, of course, not illegal! They also ransacked their homes. Police refused to tell friends and relatives when they would be released. The men were interviewed under caution under section 19 of the Public Order Act.
There is more to this than meets the eye. It is the start of a coordinated policy of harassment across the country.
There were a lot more out leafleting than thirteen but the police only arrested the people who had the “Racism cuts both ways leaflet” at that precise moment. Those at St. Annes Street police station were released between one and two in the morning. As their colleagues had not been released from other stations they went in Convoy to Wavertree Police station the area which is akin to Pakistanistan.
Outside Wavertree police station there was one of those caught-on-camera yellow police vans watching them, whilst cars full of Asians raced up and down Wavertree Road at speed beeping their horns and shouting obscenities at us while the police did nothing. It is illegal to beep a horn after 11pm at night.
Furthermore, Police at the Wavertree Road Police station have asked that all British National Party activists refrain from displaying British Flags as it is likely to cause “offence” to the ethnics in the area. They have advised that the display of the St. George cross and Welsh flags Cross of St. David & Welsh Dragon, in particular would give offence!
A victim related: “I was arrested, first time ever (I never even ever had a detention in school). The police were awful to us, they did nothing but lie and treat us like rubbish. They made a 64 year old sleep on a wood bench, denied an elderly chap with medical problems his medication saying “You will be alright till tomorrow”. Supporters from around the country arrived and demonstrated outside the stations, but as they left the city they were stopped and harassed by the police. If you want to know how low the police have sunk one of those arrested was wearing his regimental blazer and medals! They intend to take Merseyside police to law for unlawful imprisonment.
Less than two weeks after Merseyside Police had tortured Andy Tierney they raided the home and business premises of his brother, the famous Liverpool entrepreneur Peter “Quiggens” Tierney. “They said they were looking for guns,” Mr Tierney, who was also one of the original thirteen, said. “I knew that it was rubbish, because we have never had anything like that. It was obviously just an attempt at intimidation and revenge harassment after their political agenda blew up in their faces last week.” The police officers used sniffer dogs to search Mr Tierney’s house, garden and shop. When he asked if they had any justification for their actions they threatened to arrest him if he did not “shut up.”
A few months earlier, Peter and a couple of colleagues had been harassed by armed police while leafletting in Liverpool city centre:-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kpMoG2la77c
An apposite comparison for the BNP is with the Tolpuddle Martyrs and the oppression they were subjected to by the Regime of the time - it bears close comparison with the tyrannical behavior of Merseyside police. The Tolpuddle Martyrs “crime” was to try to start an organisation to represent their interests against a class bent on their ruin.
This applies to the BNP. The leaflet the “elites” want to suppress argues for parity in the consideration of racist attacks on innocent people. There are manifold explicitly racist crimes committed by ethnics on the indigenous population, encouraged by the victim complex which has been instilled in them by the state which stirs them up by relentlessly blaming whites for the slave trade, the Empire and even portrays “racism” as an exclusively white phenomenon.
The most evil example was Kriss Donald which was kept quiet by the media for years. It was an attack of which there is no white-on-black equivalent and which was far more brutal than the murder of Steven Lawrence (which has never been proved to have been a racist attack).
Unprovoked racist attacks by ethnic minorities on indigenous Britons are commonplace and the urban indigenous population know this as a simple fact. The bias in law (PDF) is perverse and unjust. The sovereignty of Parliament rests on its own resistance to laws it considered immoral during the Civil War, from this precedent not only are all Britons entitled to resist laws which are unjust but they are duty bound to do so in the defence of liberty, freedom and the sovereignty of the British people. Even to the extent of armed resistance in the last resort.
The common perception among dissident groups is that the Establishment is knowingly evil and corrupt. The kind explanation is that the core beliefs of the Establishment lend their actions an internal logic and, by their standards, virtue. For example if you accept that racism is the supreme evil as the Establishment does, then is not persecuting racists a noble and necessary activity?
Well no, because those who are negatively labelled “racists,” to dehumanise them so they can be brutalised and not worry anyone's conscience, are not harming anyone but, on the contrary, are being harmed - pushed out of their communities and denied employment as cheap labour is imported. They are trying to defend themselves, their children, their communities and that cannot be wrong.
The Establishment’s descent into tyranny and persecution is a symptom of an ideology in its death throes, where it exponentially multiplies internal contradictions and fossilises into a simplistic and irrational dogma. We saw similar phenomenon in the final stages of fascism and communism. Of course we have to allow for our own pre-conceptions and the distorting effect of our own beliefs when assessing the morality of the Establishment’s actions. But even then it is clear that they are becoming increasingly aggressive and totalitarian as their values are been shown to be false. And as they are persecuting people, they are culpable, not misguided.
Our authorities are in league with Muslims against us. There are even members of al-Qaeda serving in the police. Yet BNP members are persecuted for distributing leaflets that are lawful, as later attested by the Attorney General. The BNP may well have intolerant and unattractive elements, but it is far preferable to a government which is undoubtedly both and also genocidal and incompetent. People are, generally, encouraged by the media to believe that members of the Establishment are partisan but fundamentally decent people. I think they are thoroughly evil. The “fundamental goodness” is a pretence … pure media propaganda. They are far more evil than any BNP leader who, in his most unguarded and unwise moments, has shown more naivety than wickedness.
Post Script: later the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police admitted Liability and Merseyside Police agreed to pay each person arrested the sum of about £2200!
(1) http://m.mirror.co.uk/ms/p/tmg/mirror/view.m?id=153596&tid=27708
(2) http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/news/Anti-BNP-activists-mistakenly-target-Gloucestershire-pensioners/article-495221-detail/article.html
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp
(4) http://www.bnp.org.uk/thumbs/Racism_Cuts_Both_Ways.pdf
(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolpuddle_Martyrs
(6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
Groups concerned with liberties and rights
Statewatch : http://www.statewatch.org/
Civitas: http://www.civitas.org.uk/
Innocent members of the public will be surprised at how oppressed the British people are unless they remain quiescent and only do permitted activities like watch telly, support sports teams and go to bars. If they dare speak out or campaign against certain injustices they will be persecuted and even brutalised.
There are many in this country who sincerely believe in freedom and democracy. They frequently gravitate towards the easily-occupied “moral high ground” of condemning racism by whites. But they rarely comprehend that a totalitarian, undemocratic structure has been created to oppress whites. Do they ever stop to think that in the home of the Mother of Parliaments, the Rule of Law and representative democracy the police would torture a political prisoner?
There was even a thinly-veiled incitement to violence from the established media. On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, and in mock-worried tones:-
I’m worried about the 12,000 BNP members whose names and addresses have been leaked on the internet. I pray their details don’t fall into the hands of any of those black radical groups known to take a very dim view of white neo-Nazis. It would be truly awful if anything nasty happened to these nice people wouldn’t it?
In part his wish was realised. In Cheltenham, widow Natalia Colthurst received six threatening calls in which she was asked her name and why she supports the BNP. The caller warned, “We know where you live”. The 72-year-old, who lives in Whaddon Road, was advised by bereavement councillors to join social groups when her husband died in 2006. The former language teacher said after two BNP meetings early last year, she and her elderly friend realised it wasn’t for them and broke with the party.
The house of George and June Papps on Lysons Avenue, Gloucester, was vandalised, with graffiti saying “BNP Scum”, scrawled on a wall. The couple, aged 79 and 77, are both recovering from cancer and said they were singled-out because their son, who has moved away, is a member.
Another eye-opener for trusting members of the public is British bobbies torturing a political prisoner, BNP member Andrew Tierney. He was one of thirteen BNP activists arrested by Merseyside police, from whom fingerprints and DNA were taken to be added to the National Database. The media have not covered this but from the BNP‘s own website and from personal interviews I discovered the reality of what happened.
The victim related: “They then somehow applied a tremendous pressure behind my ears, inflicting great pain. They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen, he was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints. They put a deep gash in his forehead in the process.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab,” he continued.
The episode lasted at least a quarter of an hour, and the victim was left shaken and in pain. Photographs taken shortly afterwards clearly showed bleeding from wounds sustained behind both his ears. They applied some kind of pressure to his arms and his side, once again leaving considerable bruising, evidenced again by photographs taken shortly after his release.
This is similar to how the Americans torture political prisoners at Guantanamo Bay:-
“The military police inflicted so much pain, Mr Aamer said he thought he was going to die. The MPs pressed on pressure points all over his body: his temples, just under his jawline, in the hollow beneath his ears. They choked him. They bent his nose so hard he thought it would break.”
Here is a technical analysis of what they did to the political prisoner in Liverpool: they were applying pressure to the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra. It’s taught as a pressure point in both Karate and Ju-jitsu, either to strike at, or press, to break a grip or grapple.
You may cause the atlanto-occipital joint to cavitate by doing this which is like cracking the knuckles, except that as this done at the base of the skull it will probably frighten anyone who doesn’t understand what is going on. They might think their neck has been broken!
“They then pulled my head back so far that my windpipe was restricted, and while I was gasping for air, applied pressure to the front of my neck as well,” he said. Nearly collapsing from the pain and lack of oxygen. He was then unable to prevent the policemen from taking his fingerprints.
Pulling the head back forcefully can and will break the neck. You will either die very quickly or become paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair for life or tetraplegic like Christopher Reeve, depending on the location of the fracture and how far any bone fragments from the vertical lamina enter the spinal cord itself. Attacking the trachea in the manner described can also be fatal, but a fatality is more likely to occur from a violent blow rather than pressure. It’s not so much the collapse of the trachea but disruption to the baro receptors located at the bifurcation of the carotid artery. These control blood pressure to the brain and, if sufficiently traumatised, can shut off blood supply to the brain permanently.
“Next they grabbed hold of my nose, and once again somehow applied the most penetrating pressure to the back of my neck, forcing my mouth open to take a DNA swab.”
Again, very dangerous. It depends exactly where the pressure is applied, but a broken neck or avulsion of the dens could occur. The dens is a little bit of bone about the size of the last phalange of your little finger that acts as a pivot for the heads rotation. It is sometimes avulsed or pulled off in whiplash victims. It sits just posterior to the brain stem, in the area where breathing is regulated, so you don’t want a broken dens shoved through that particular area!”
This action from a Police Officer can only be justified in a desperate one-on-one struggle with a bigger and stronger opponent, but is not appropriate for a custody suite. Either the Police have a lack of understanding of the potential dangers of their action, in which case their training needs to be revised, or they were deliberately reckless. It is easy to see how people can be killed in police custody.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Deaths_in_UK_Police_Custody
In addition a 70 year-old man, Arnold Briddle, was refused his prescribed medication for third-stage renal failure. Merseyside Police could have murdered two people quite easily that night!
This all started on Saturday the 22nd of November when Liverpool’s political police arrested the thirteen BNP members for distributing Racism Cuts Both Ways (PDF) leaflets, which is, of course, not illegal! They also ransacked their homes. Police refused to tell friends and relatives when they would be released. The men were interviewed under caution under section 19 of the Public Order Act.
There is more to this than meets the eye. It is the start of a coordinated policy of harassment across the country.
There were a lot more out leafleting than thirteen but the police only arrested the people who had the “Racism cuts both ways leaflet” at that precise moment. Those at St. Annes Street police station were released between one and two in the morning. As their colleagues had not been released from other stations they went in Convoy to Wavertree Police station the area which is akin to Pakistanistan.
Outside Wavertree police station there was one of those caught-on-camera yellow police vans watching them, whilst cars full of Asians raced up and down Wavertree Road at speed beeping their horns and shouting obscenities at us while the police did nothing. It is illegal to beep a horn after 11pm at night.
Furthermore, Police at the Wavertree Road Police station have asked that all British National Party activists refrain from displaying British Flags as it is likely to cause “offence” to the ethnics in the area. They have advised that the display of the St. George cross and Welsh flags Cross of St. David & Welsh Dragon, in particular would give offence!
A victim related: “I was arrested, first time ever (I never even ever had a detention in school). The police were awful to us, they did nothing but lie and treat us like rubbish. They made a 64 year old sleep on a wood bench, denied an elderly chap with medical problems his medication saying “You will be alright till tomorrow”. Supporters from around the country arrived and demonstrated outside the stations, but as they left the city they were stopped and harassed by the police. If you want to know how low the police have sunk one of those arrested was wearing his regimental blazer and medals! They intend to take Merseyside police to law for unlawful imprisonment.
Less than two weeks after Merseyside Police had tortured Andy Tierney they raided the home and business premises of his brother, the famous Liverpool entrepreneur Peter “Quiggens” Tierney. “They said they were looking for guns,” Mr Tierney, who was also one of the original thirteen, said. “I knew that it was rubbish, because we have never had anything like that. It was obviously just an attempt at intimidation and revenge harassment after their political agenda blew up in their faces last week.” The police officers used sniffer dogs to search Mr Tierney’s house, garden and shop. When he asked if they had any justification for their actions they threatened to arrest him if he did not “shut up.”
A few months earlier, Peter and a couple of colleagues had been harassed by armed police while leafletting in Liverpool city centre:-
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=kpMoG2la77c
An apposite comparison for the BNP is with the Tolpuddle Martyrs and the oppression they were subjected to by the Regime of the time - it bears close comparison with the tyrannical behavior of Merseyside police. The Tolpuddle Martyrs “crime” was to try to start an organisation to represent their interests against a class bent on their ruin.
This applies to the BNP. The leaflet the “elites” want to suppress argues for parity in the consideration of racist attacks on innocent people. There are manifold explicitly racist crimes committed by ethnics on the indigenous population, encouraged by the victim complex which has been instilled in them by the state which stirs them up by relentlessly blaming whites for the slave trade, the Empire and even portrays “racism” as an exclusively white phenomenon.
The most evil example was Kriss Donald which was kept quiet by the media for years. It was an attack of which there is no white-on-black equivalent and which was far more brutal than the murder of Steven Lawrence (which has never been proved to have been a racist attack).
Unprovoked racist attacks by ethnic minorities on indigenous Britons are commonplace and the urban indigenous population know this as a simple fact. The bias in law (PDF) is perverse and unjust. The sovereignty of Parliament rests on its own resistance to laws it considered immoral during the Civil War, from this precedent not only are all Britons entitled to resist laws which are unjust but they are duty bound to do so in the defence of liberty, freedom and the sovereignty of the British people. Even to the extent of armed resistance in the last resort.
The common perception among dissident groups is that the Establishment is knowingly evil and corrupt. The kind explanation is that the core beliefs of the Establishment lend their actions an internal logic and, by their standards, virtue. For example if you accept that racism is the supreme evil as the Establishment does, then is not persecuting racists a noble and necessary activity?
Well no, because those who are negatively labelled “racists,” to dehumanise them so they can be brutalised and not worry anyone's conscience, are not harming anyone but, on the contrary, are being harmed - pushed out of their communities and denied employment as cheap labour is imported. They are trying to defend themselves, their children, their communities and that cannot be wrong.
The Establishment’s descent into tyranny and persecution is a symptom of an ideology in its death throes, where it exponentially multiplies internal contradictions and fossilises into a simplistic and irrational dogma. We saw similar phenomenon in the final stages of fascism and communism. Of course we have to allow for our own pre-conceptions and the distorting effect of our own beliefs when assessing the morality of the Establishment’s actions. But even then it is clear that they are becoming increasingly aggressive and totalitarian as their values are been shown to be false. And as they are persecuting people, they are culpable, not misguided.
Our authorities are in league with Muslims against us. There are even members of al-Qaeda serving in the police. Yet BNP members are persecuted for distributing leaflets that are lawful, as later attested by the Attorney General. The BNP may well have intolerant and unattractive elements, but it is far preferable to a government which is undoubtedly both and also genocidal and incompetent. People are, generally, encouraged by the media to believe that members of the Establishment are partisan but fundamentally decent people. I think they are thoroughly evil. The “fundamental goodness” is a pretence … pure media propaganda. They are far more evil than any BNP leader who, in his most unguarded and unwise moments, has shown more naivety than wickedness.
Post Script: later the Chief Constable of Merseyside Police admitted Liability and Merseyside Police agreed to pay each person arrested the sum of about £2200!
(1) http://m.mirror.co.uk/ms/p/tmg/mirror/view.m?id=153596&tid=27708
(2) http://www.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/news/Anti-BNP-activists-mistakenly-target-Gloucestershire-pensioners/article-495221-detail/article.html
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_detention_camp
(4) http://www.bnp.org.uk/thumbs/Racism_Cuts_Both_Ways.pdf
(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolpuddle_Martyrs
(6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kriss_Donald
Groups concerned with liberties and rights
Statewatch : http://www.statewatch.org/
Civitas: http://www.civitas.org.uk/
Wednesday 3 December 2008
British Government Colludes with Muslim Terrorists
British Government Colludes with Muslim Terrorists
Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund.
In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam which, together with the Shi’ites in Iran, aims to make Islam dominant in the world. Saudi money has financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country promoting holy war and converting thousands of British Muslims.
Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration on the other and our Prime Minister is colluding with them. Lord Mandelson admitted that the Saudis and other Gulf states would get more influence in global institutions in return.
Islamic influence is spreading into our cultural life as they buy Western institutions. Manchester City F C was is now owned by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
Islamist ideas are also spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance.
Our traditional elites are colluding with them against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing British students of in favour of overseas students.
The elites submission to Saudi was clear when they suspend rule of law as they did by abandoning the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities that, if the case continued, ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and oher politicians are colluding with against the general public!
Muslims have influence over us through the combination of the threat of violence and wealth,
yet, Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance, on the basis that it is a source of vast wealth but Sharia is a project for Islamising society that prohibits interest.
It was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the sharia banking system. Usually, the clerics who decide where this ‘charity’ money should go are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel; and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.
Many charitable donations are directed to terrorist organisations like Hamas and Hezbollah. This influence was clear when the banks refused the BNP, a legal political party, banking facilities.
Brown is giving Muslims more influence over our lives yet knows that terrorists are organising to go to war with us because he is regularly briefed by the Secret Services. The growth of terror cells was revealed in a leaked Government intelligence report states that secret al-Qaeda cells in London, Birmingham and Luton are planning mass-casualty attacks, reported the Telegraph of 9 Nov 2008.
The document was compiled by the intelligence branch of the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch. It reveals that "some thousands" of extremists are active in the UK. They are mainly born here and aged between 18 and 30. Many are thought to have been trained abroad in terrorist camps.
The report "International Terrorism", states: "For the foreseeable future the UK will continue to be a high-priority target for international terrorists aligned with al-Qaeda. We are under threat from “British nationals”, including Muslim converts, foreign terrorists based here and terrorists planning attacks from abroad." It notes that the threat from the Islamist terrorists in the UK is "diverse and widely distributed" and that the numbers of terrorist in Britain is "difficult to judge". The document does state, that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, which is based in MI5's headquarters at Thames House in London, estimates "some thousands of extremists in the UK committed to supporting Jihadi activities, either here or abroad".
Jonathan Evans, the director general of MI5, said last year they had identified at least 2,000 men and women who were a risk to national security and public safety.
Home Office figures record that since 2001, over 1,200 terrorist suspects have been arrested, over 140 charged and more than 45 convicted of terrorism offences. It is also estimated that there are 200 terrorist networks functioning in Britain today who are involved in at least 30 plots.
This shows the number of terrorists threatening the UK is growing. The majority of extremists are British nationals of south Asian, mainly Pakistanistanistani origin but there are also extremists from north and east Africa, Iraq and the Middle East, and a number of converts.
Knowing this, in November 2006, the Government were advertising for immigrants by placing an Home Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraging immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs, in embassies across the world including those were terrorist come here from. The advert was first discovered in the Embassy in Pakistanistanistan!
The overwhelming majority of Muslims at war with us are of active service age - 18-30. "The main concentrations are in London, Birmingham, with significant terrorist networks in the South East, notably Luton. These enemy networks are spreading their propaganda, training more terrorists, fund raising from local council grants, lottery; and, procuring non-lethal military equipment to support Jihads in Pakistanistanistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, against our soldiers and sending recruits to the conflicts.
MI5 believe that the risk of terror attacks by Islamist is widespread. To combat this, MI5 has nine regional offices and has nearly doubled its staff from 1,800 in 2001 to 3,500 today. But is recruiting from Muslim communities and allowing itself to be subverted. The elites play down the number of Muslims in Britain but we know it is many more than 1.5million. At least a million live in London. There are c150,000 Muslims in Birmingham and a further c27,000 in Luton. There are an estimated 10,000 Afro-Caribbean Muslims or white converts.
Luton has a growing Muslim population and has been a hot-bed of radical activity. The extremist group al-Muhajiroun is active in the town but the police ignore them. The 7/7 bombers gathered in Luton, to travel to London to kill people. Yet the Government still encourage them to pour into the country!
The ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in Luton shows police complicity. The Muslims are attacking people from all races and are trying to ethnically clear a West Indians in Luton by throwing bricks through their windows. The police have been ignoring it, but TV showed a residents meeting with episcopalian Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. (1)The police have “Hate Crime officers” to harry and persecute any who try to expose what Muslims are doing!
Some of the terrorists involved in the plot to bring down airliners using liquid bombs came from London, where a bomb factory had been established. In Birmingham, a bulkhead of Muslim territorialism is where the kidnaping of a Muslim in the British army was planned.
The leader Parviz Khan, who was financed by state benefits, formed a terrorist cell intended to video the execution and release the film on the internet.
It is senior Government ministers who encourage terrorists to come here. Yahoo news of 11 November 2008 reported that a Hizbollah radical was allowed to enter the UK after ministers announced a crackdown on extremists. Ibrahim Mousawi spoke at a conference at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. Mr Mousawi, a former editor of Hizbollah's television channel, is a "well-known extremist", The armed wing of the Middle Eastern Islamic group is on a Home Office list of proscribed terror organisations. Yet, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, had announced that extremists would have to prove their innocence under new rules and promised to publish a list of banned individuals!
Our elites act in consort with Muslims in changing our ways to be more suitable for their children. Rowan Williamse, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity's history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for 'the common good'. What a traitorous, evil man!
Our rulers are also allowing Muslims to take over our legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government has secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. It has now come out that Sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.
The authorities are also encouraging anti-Semitic attacks in Britain which has reached its second-highest level ever(17 May 2008. The Independent). Figures show 547 such incidents were recorded last year, of which a record 114 were violent assaults. The Community Security Trust (CST), which protects the Jewish community, counted every recorded anti-Semitic assault, threat, act of abuse and damage or desecration of Jewish property across the country. Mark Gardner, a spokesman for CST, said:” the usual allies of British Jews fear showing support would further the Zionist cause. In the 1990s, when Jews faced attacks from the far right there was a lot of sympathy from the liberal left establishments, but today the same voices simply see anti-Semitism as something useful to Zionists.”
The Miami Herald (October 10, 2004) had an article, "French Jews Escape to United States," giving copious examples of French Jews who moved to southern Florida because of their fears of the militant Muslim minority in France.
At the same time the Government and other authorities persecute opponents of this collusion. “Chris Keates, the general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women teachers, said: “Those who declare their affiliation to the BNP should not be allowed to work in the teaching profession or in public services.” The Royal Institute of British Architects is persecuting BNP members. Any candidate for election to RIBA’s council has to declare whether or not they are BNP. members. Compare this to anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Germany. (5)
The police not only ignore Muslims grooming our young girls but also the selling of heroin and crack. They collude with Muslim extremists and persecute those who try to warn about the dangers - police raided Blackburn BNP organiser Robin Evans and Pendle councillor Brian Parker at dawn on suspicion of distributing a leaflet showing that Mulim gangs distribute heroin. The police told Mr. Parker’s wife that it is over the heroin leaflet, but a Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson told the Muslim News in October 2008, “We looked at the evidence and concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to advice the police to prosecute on ground of racial hatred.” The leaflet reveals to the public that Muslim gangs are “almost exclusively responsible” for the heroin trade, of which 95% comes from Afghanistan and Pakistanistanistan.
At the same time up to eight serving police officers and civilian staff are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda. Some are thought to have attended terrorist training camps in Pakistanistanistan and Afghanistan. The names of these officers were featured on a dossier, drawn up with the help of MI5, that was instigated because of fears that Muslim terrorists were taking advantage of the “positive discrimination” schemes used by the police to attract more ethnic staff. (3)
It is clear that by their own logic the British police can not be trusted to uphold the law fairly and impartially as they are witchunting certain types of people from the force and giving preferment to Muslims terrorists! The real intention is shown because al-Queda officers were not sacked, because the police said that they lacked the “legal power” to dismiss them.
They claim Classified intelligence reports raising concerns about police officers affiliations with Muslim terrorist cells can not be used to justify their dismissal, but a detective inspector serving in the professional standards department of a Midlands force is checking the leaked BNP members list against his force personnel records. He said: "Even people on the list who are lapsed members of the BNP, or who have just approached the party expressing an interest in joining, will be of interest to us."
This a clear insight into the fact that the practice of police work is governed by institutional prejudice against “whites”. Officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP because they would not uphold the law in a multri-racial society impartially. By their own logic employing al-Queda members or supporters suggests the police do are not really fighting terrorism but the British people who oppose it. In fact Prime Minister Gordon Brown who collaborates with the Saudis appointed John Cruddas MP to spearhead a campaign against “the far right”.
(1)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....king-police-don’t-dare-sack-them.html
(2)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ilKIeag1HUc&feature=related
http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=248045
http://www.lutononsunday.com/lutononsunday/DisplayArticle.asp?id=248100
http://www.cogichq.co.uk/Text/bishop_a.htm
http://www.yoel.info/demographicjihad.htm
(3) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/pol....rs-1026311.html
(4) - http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/thefarright-freedomofinformation
(5) http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?ModuleId=10005681
Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund.
In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam which, together with the Shi’ites in Iran, aims to make Islam dominant in the world. Saudi money has financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country promoting holy war and converting thousands of British Muslims.
Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration on the other and our Prime Minister is colluding with them. Lord Mandelson admitted that the Saudis and other Gulf states would get more influence in global institutions in return.
Islamic influence is spreading into our cultural life as they buy Western institutions. Manchester City F C was is now owned by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
Islamist ideas are also spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance.
Our traditional elites are colluding with them against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing British students of in favour of overseas students.
The elites submission to Saudi was clear when they suspend rule of law as they did by abandoning the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems because of an explicit threat made by the Saudi authorities that, if the case continued, ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk, as explained by Britain’s former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. These are the controllers of terror groups in the West that Brown and oher politicians are colluding with against the general public!
Muslims have influence over us through the combination of the threat of violence and wealth,
yet, Brown is to make London the global centre of Islamic banking. Britain’s major banks are accepting Sharia finance, on the basis that it is a source of vast wealth but Sharia is a project for Islamising society that prohibits interest.
It was founded in mid-20th century by Islamist ideologues to further global Islamic rule by creating separate administrative systems. Muslims have to donate some of their income to charity, and that goes through the sharia banking system. Usually, the clerics who decide where this ‘charity’ money should go are advocates of terror like Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, who supports suicide bombing in Iraq and Israel; and Sheik Muhammed Taqi Usmani, who ran a madrassa that supported the Taliban, yet sits on the sharia supervisory board of the Dow Jones Islamic Index Fund.
Many charitable donations are directed to terrorist organisations like Hamas and Hezbollah. This influence was clear when the banks refused the BNP, a legal political party, banking facilities.
Brown is giving Muslims more influence over our lives yet knows that terrorists are organising to go to war with us because he is regularly briefed by the Secret Services. The growth of terror cells was revealed in a leaked Government intelligence report states that secret al-Qaeda cells in London, Birmingham and Luton are planning mass-casualty attacks, reported the Telegraph of 9 Nov 2008.
The document was compiled by the intelligence branch of the Ministry of Defence, MI5 and Special Branch. It reveals that "some thousands" of extremists are active in the UK. They are mainly born here and aged between 18 and 30. Many are thought to have been trained abroad in terrorist camps.
The report "International Terrorism", states: "For the foreseeable future the UK will continue to be a high-priority target for international terrorists aligned with al-Qaeda. We are under threat from “British nationals”, including Muslim converts, foreign terrorists based here and terrorists planning attacks from abroad." It notes that the threat from the Islamist terrorists in the UK is "diverse and widely distributed" and that the numbers of terrorist in Britain is "difficult to judge". The document does state, that the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre, which is based in MI5's headquarters at Thames House in London, estimates "some thousands of extremists in the UK committed to supporting Jihadi activities, either here or abroad".
Jonathan Evans, the director general of MI5, said last year they had identified at least 2,000 men and women who were a risk to national security and public safety.
Home Office figures record that since 2001, over 1,200 terrorist suspects have been arrested, over 140 charged and more than 45 convicted of terrorism offences. It is also estimated that there are 200 terrorist networks functioning in Britain today who are involved in at least 30 plots.
This shows the number of terrorists threatening the UK is growing. The majority of extremists are British nationals of south Asian, mainly Pakistanistanistani origin but there are also extremists from north and east Africa, Iraq and the Middle East, and a number of converts.
Knowing this, in November 2006, the Government were advertising for immigrants by placing an Home Office pamphlet 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encouraging immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs, in embassies across the world including those were terrorist come here from. The advert was first discovered in the Embassy in Pakistanistanistan!
The overwhelming majority of Muslims at war with us are of active service age - 18-30. "The main concentrations are in London, Birmingham, with significant terrorist networks in the South East, notably Luton. These enemy networks are spreading their propaganda, training more terrorists, fund raising from local council grants, lottery; and, procuring non-lethal military equipment to support Jihads in Pakistanistanistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, against our soldiers and sending recruits to the conflicts.
MI5 believe that the risk of terror attacks by Islamist is widespread. To combat this, MI5 has nine regional offices and has nearly doubled its staff from 1,800 in 2001 to 3,500 today. But is recruiting from Muslim communities and allowing itself to be subverted. The elites play down the number of Muslims in Britain but we know it is many more than 1.5million. At least a million live in London. There are c150,000 Muslims in Birmingham and a further c27,000 in Luton. There are an estimated 10,000 Afro-Caribbean Muslims or white converts.
Luton has a growing Muslim population and has been a hot-bed of radical activity. The extremist group al-Muhajiroun is active in the town but the police ignore them. The 7/7 bombers gathered in Luton, to travel to London to kill people. Yet the Government still encourage them to pour into the country!
The ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in Luton shows police complicity. The Muslims are attacking people from all races and are trying to ethnically clear a West Indians in Luton by throwing bricks through their windows. The police have been ignoring it, but TV showed a residents meeting with episcopalian Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. (1)The police have “Hate Crime officers” to harry and persecute any who try to expose what Muslims are doing!
Some of the terrorists involved in the plot to bring down airliners using liquid bombs came from London, where a bomb factory had been established. In Birmingham, a bulkhead of Muslim territorialism is where the kidnaping of a Muslim in the British army was planned.
The leader Parviz Khan, who was financed by state benefits, formed a terrorist cell intended to video the execution and release the film on the internet.
It is senior Government ministers who encourage terrorists to come here. Yahoo news of 11 November 2008 reported that a Hizbollah radical was allowed to enter the UK after ministers announced a crackdown on extremists. Ibrahim Mousawi spoke at a conference at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London. Mr Mousawi, a former editor of Hizbollah's television channel, is a "well-known extremist", The armed wing of the Middle Eastern Islamic group is on a Home Office list of proscribed terror organisations. Yet, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, had announced that extremists would have to prove their innocence under new rules and promised to publish a list of banned individuals!
Our elites act in consort with Muslims in changing our ways to be more suitable for their children. Rowan Williamse, Archbishop of Canterbury, was quoted in the Daily Mail of 5th July 2008 as saying Christian doctrine is offensive to Muslims, and criticising Christianity's history for its violence, its use of harsh punishments and its betrayal of its peaceful principles. His sent a conciliatory letter to Islamic leaders calling for an alliance between the two faiths for 'the common good'. What a traitorous, evil man!
Our rulers are also allowing Muslims to take over our legal system. The Sunday Times September 14th 2008 reported Islamic law has been officially adopted in Britain. The government has secretly sanctioned the powers for Sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence. Rulings issued by a network of five Sharia courts are enforceable by the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court. Before this rulings of Sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and required voluntary compliance among Muslims. It has now come out that Sharia courts with these powers have been set up in London, Birmingham, Bradford and Manchester with the network’s headquarters in Nuneaton, Warwickshire. Two more courts are being planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.
The authorities are also encouraging anti-Semitic attacks in Britain which has reached its second-highest level ever(17 May 2008. The Independent). Figures show 547 such incidents were recorded last year, of which a record 114 were violent assaults. The Community Security Trust (CST), which protects the Jewish community, counted every recorded anti-Semitic assault, threat, act of abuse and damage or desecration of Jewish property across the country. Mark Gardner, a spokesman for CST, said:” the usual allies of British Jews fear showing support would further the Zionist cause. In the 1990s, when Jews faced attacks from the far right there was a lot of sympathy from the liberal left establishments, but today the same voices simply see anti-Semitism as something useful to Zionists.”
The Miami Herald (October 10, 2004) had an article, "French Jews Escape to United States," giving copious examples of French Jews who moved to southern Florida because of their fears of the militant Muslim minority in France.
At the same time the Government and other authorities persecute opponents of this collusion. “Chris Keates, the general secretary of the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women teachers, said: “Those who declare their affiliation to the BNP should not be allowed to work in the teaching profession or in public services.” The Royal Institute of British Architects is persecuting BNP members. Any candidate for election to RIBA’s council has to declare whether or not they are BNP. members. Compare this to anti-Jewish legislation in pre-war Germany. (5)
The police not only ignore Muslims grooming our young girls but also the selling of heroin and crack. They collude with Muslim extremists and persecute those who try to warn about the dangers - police raided Blackburn BNP organiser Robin Evans and Pendle councillor Brian Parker at dawn on suspicion of distributing a leaflet showing that Mulim gangs distribute heroin. The police told Mr. Parker’s wife that it is over the heroin leaflet, but a Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson told the Muslim News in October 2008, “We looked at the evidence and concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to advice the police to prosecute on ground of racial hatred.” The leaflet reveals to the public that Muslim gangs are “almost exclusively responsible” for the heroin trade, of which 95% comes from Afghanistan and Pakistanistanistan.
At the same time up to eight serving police officers and civilian staff are suspected of having links to Al Qaeda. Some are thought to have attended terrorist training camps in Pakistanistanistan and Afghanistan. The names of these officers were featured on a dossier, drawn up with the help of MI5, that was instigated because of fears that Muslim terrorists were taking advantage of the “positive discrimination” schemes used by the police to attract more ethnic staff. (3)
It is clear that by their own logic the British police can not be trusted to uphold the law fairly and impartially as they are witchunting certain types of people from the force and giving preferment to Muslims terrorists! The real intention is shown because al-Queda officers were not sacked, because the police said that they lacked the “legal power” to dismiss them.
They claim Classified intelligence reports raising concerns about police officers affiliations with Muslim terrorist cells can not be used to justify their dismissal, but a detective inspector serving in the professional standards department of a Midlands force is checking the leaked BNP members list against his force personnel records. He said: "Even people on the list who are lapsed members of the BNP, or who have just approached the party expressing an interest in joining, will be of interest to us."
This a clear insight into the fact that the practice of police work is governed by institutional prejudice against “whites”. Officers are banned from joining or promoting the BNP because they would not uphold the law in a multri-racial society impartially. By their own logic employing al-Queda members or supporters suggests the police do are not really fighting terrorism but the British people who oppose it. In fact Prime Minister Gordon Brown who collaborates with the Saudis appointed John Cruddas MP to spearhead a campaign against “the far right”.
(1)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....king-police-don’t-dare-sack-them.html
(2)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ilKIeag1HUc&feature=related
http://www.bedsonsunday.com/bedsonsunday-news/DisplayArticle.asp?ID=248045
http://www.lutononsunday.com/lutononsunday/DisplayArticle.asp?id=248100
http://www.cogichq.co.uk/Text/bishop_a.htm
http://www.yoel.info/demographicjihad.htm
(3) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/pol....rs-1026311.html
(4) - http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/nov/19/thefarright-freedomofinformation
(5) http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php?ModuleId=10005681
Monday 1 December 2008
Great British Tradition of Conserving Homogeneity
To insinuate those of us who follow a traditional Conservative way and who lost thousands fighting Nazism to be maliciously called Nazis or Fascists is disrespectful and offensive. A racial world view is a traditional world view and goes back to our Anglo Saxon tribal days.
Hitler jumped on the bandwagon and took it to extremes. Instead of being something that held people together he made it into a form of aggression and hatred. But he was an exception and not part of our tradition anyway.
In fact many aspects of wanting to conserve or recreate our homogeneity can be traced back deep into our history. We have a great and noble tradition of Conserving out homogeneity and until after the war had a better and more pleasant lives for being homogenous.
There is concern that following lessons from history that large groups of people with not only little in common but also historical grudges will spoil civic life and possibly cause bloodshed.
Queen Elizabeth was in the Great Tradition and in 1596, sent an "open letter" to the Lord Mayor of London, stating "there are of late divers blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are allready here to manie," ordering that they be deported.
A week later, she repeated: "good pleasure to have those kinde of people sent out of the lande" and commissioned the merchant Casper van Senden to "take up" certain "blackamoores here in this realme and to transport them into Spaine and Portugall." In 1601, she again complained about the "great numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which (as she is informed) are crept into this realm," "infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel," and had them repatriated.
Edmund Burke, offered a definition of a nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestory, and continuity: “As the ends of such a partner-ship cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”
A passage in Edward Gibbon’s masterpiece “The Decline and Fall of Rome” is prophetic. He pondered what would have befallen us had Muslims won the battle of Poitiers in France in 733. He saw that battle as a major turning point in European history: “the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Mahomet."
There is concern that the immigrants will come to dominate us. We read repeated reports that we are becoming a minority in our own towns and cities.
The immigrants are human and like us, are subject to the same failings and are likely to treat us badly as we did them.
Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852), “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man. The particular equality of a particular race is a matter of municipal arrangement, and depends entirely on political considerations and circumstances; but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”
Sir Winston Churchill followed the noble tradition but unfortunately had failing health. Yet he still tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan "Keep England White." (1)
A hero against mass immigration in the early 1950s was the fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grand son of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendant of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth.
He fought his battles in Cabinet. A letter preserved at the National Archive written to Viscount Swinton in 1954, shows his standpoint. Swinton like others only wanted the powers to deport criminals, sick immigrants and charges on the state but Salisbury was deeper and wiser than that and foretold: “I should not be satisfied with the legislation which you suggest. I feel that it would only be tinkering with what is really becoming a fundamental problem for us all, though it is only beginning to push its ugly head above the surface of politics. The figures which we have been given make it clear that we are faced with a problem which, though at at present it may be only a cloud the size of a man’s hand, may easily come to fill the whole political horizon … Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main causes of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.”
Oliver Lyttletton (later Lord Chandos) wanted to introduce deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants: “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”
He had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependents as he shall bring with him to the island”.
Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission. Lyttleton letter to Swinton 31/3/1954. We alone allowed anyone in.
Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) first tried in 1954 to introduce a bill to control immigration under the 10 minute rule. Before it got to Parliament the Commonwealth Affairs committee had 17 present when 14 spoke and only one supported the bill.
In May 1958, 3 months before the racial battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham Osborne had written to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskill who handed it to his secretary to reply, “The Labour Party is opposed to restriction of immigration as every Commonwealth citizen has the right as a British subject to enter this country.” Then 3 months after He instigated a Commons debate on the 5th of December 1958 when Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley stated, “We are categorically against it (restrictions).” Supporting Osborne Labour’s Frank Tomney, remarked on elected representatives ignoring their constituents. “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.”
His sincerity was clear. After vainly pleading with the Conservative backbench 1922 committee to consider the consequences of uncontrolled immigration, he broke down and wept. At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961) he stated, “The world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.”
Norman Pannell Conservative member for Liverpool (Kirkdale) served in the Nigerian Legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years. He proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries, for the U.K. had an open door policy and let anyone in. “When I visited Nigeria two years ago as a member of Parliament without ultimate responsibility for the affairs of the that country, I was given an entry permit valid for 14 days and renewable subject to good behaviour.” He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to stop Cyril Osborne speaking who stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of a letter of his from the morning’s Telegraph. Pannell stated that though Butler had disagreed with limiting numbers, had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but nothing had been done.
There is the importation of diseases which puts the population at risk. In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Harold Gurden wrote, “On the health question we find the middle ring of the city(Birmingham), where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence. It is the opinion of medical officers that at least some immigrants are suffering with this disease before entering the country...We have a duty to our constituents.”
In 2007 it has been revealed that we have a record number of cases of TB. This has been imported by our authorities.
When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; now they regularly have to shoot people in the street, we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.
At a Society For Individual freedom meeting at Birmingham Town Hall, on 18 4 1968, 2 days before Enoch’s famous Rivers of Blood speech, Sir Ronald Bell warned of the forthcoming Race Relations Act, "I am profoundly convinced that if this immediate threat is not sharply challenged and then fought with as great a persistence as has been shown over recent years by those who have worked for this engine of oppression, then many further uses of law and of the power of the state for shaping men’s minds will follow.”
To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms.
K. Harvey Proctor addressed the 1983 Conservative party conference ,but no senior party member sat on the platform apart from a glum looking John Biffen who only clapped sparely.
Mrs Thatcher was not present.
In 1981 Proctor had announced a plan by the Monday club Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell.
At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984 guest of honour Enoch Powell revealed that the Conservative party had threatened to not speak to Proctor for his belief in repatriation which would have been the first time in their history they had sent one of their MP’s to Coventry!
In his outstanding book “The Unarmed Invasion”(1965) Lord Elton wrote,” We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In his autobiography the great Rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts he saw while touring Jamaica for immigrants to come here and how clear it was that they were being brought here as cheap labour.
They are there now because our rulers are on their side against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing us out of there in favour of overseas students. As reported in the Independent 21 April 2004.
A TV poll marking 40 years since Enoch’s 'Rivers of Blood' speech found most people anticipate racial conflict over the years to come. The unprecedented level of prosperity Europe has enjoyed for years that has prevented the civil unrest but we are now heading into recession. In an echo of Enoch’s warnings on “racial civil war” The Sunday Times of June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire.
He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years.
Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight.
We never asked if we wanted, this invasion, not by proud conquering warlords, but by cringing Third World masses with whom we have nothing in common but the elites wanted for cheap labour and to expiate their historic guilt, while they lived peacefully in fine areas.
The words of these heroes became reality on 7 July 2005 when 52 victims of Third World immigration were blown up in of London. Enoch had told the Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971, “Yet it is more truly when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”
As Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said On May 24 1929:“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.
(1) Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224
Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
Hitler jumped on the bandwagon and took it to extremes. Instead of being something that held people together he made it into a form of aggression and hatred. But he was an exception and not part of our tradition anyway.
In fact many aspects of wanting to conserve or recreate our homogeneity can be traced back deep into our history. We have a great and noble tradition of Conserving out homogeneity and until after the war had a better and more pleasant lives for being homogenous.
There is concern that following lessons from history that large groups of people with not only little in common but also historical grudges will spoil civic life and possibly cause bloodshed.
Queen Elizabeth was in the Great Tradition and in 1596, sent an "open letter" to the Lord Mayor of London, stating "there are of late divers blackmoores brought into this realme, of which kinde of people there are allready here to manie," ordering that they be deported.
A week later, she repeated: "good pleasure to have those kinde of people sent out of the lande" and commissioned the merchant Casper van Senden to "take up" certain "blackamoores here in this realme and to transport them into Spaine and Portugall." In 1601, she again complained about the "great numbers of Negars and Blackamoors which (as she is informed) are crept into this realm," "infidels, having no understanding of Christ or his Gospel," and had them repatriated.
Edmund Burke, offered a definition of a nation which involves a shared identity, history and ancestory, and continuity: “As the ends of such a partner-ship cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”
A passage in Edward Gibbon’s masterpiece “The Decline and Fall of Rome” is prophetic. He pondered what would have befallen us had Muslims won the battle of Poitiers in France in 733. He saw that battle as a major turning point in European history: “the Arabian fleet might have sailed without a naval combat into the mouth of the Thames. Perhaps the interpretation of the Koran would now be taught in the schools of Oxford, and her pulpits might demonstrate to a circumcised people the sanctity and truth of the revelation of Mahomet."
There is concern that the immigrants will come to dominate us. We read repeated reports that we are becoming a minority in our own towns and cities.
The immigrants are human and like us, are subject to the same failings and are likely to treat us badly as we did them.
Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote in Chapter 24 of “Lord George Bentinck: A Political Biography”(1852), “The Jews...are a living and the most striking evidence of the falsity of that pernicious doctrine of modern times, the natural equality of man. The particular equality of a particular race is a matter of municipal arrangement, and depends entirely on political considerations and circumstances; but the natural equality of man now in vogue, and taking the form of cosmopolitan fraternity, is a principle which, were it possible to act on it, would deteriorate the great races and destroy all the genius of the world. What would be the consequences on the great Anglo-Saxon republic, for example, were its citizens to secede from their sound principle of reserve, and mingle with their negro and coloured populations? In the course of time they would become so deteriorated that their states would probably be reconquered and regained by the aborigines whom they have expelled, and who would then be their superiors.”
Sir Winston Churchill followed the noble tradition but unfortunately had failing health. Yet he still tried to heal the rupture in our national continuity in 1955 by having a bill to control immigration drawn up which was not ready until June, two months after he stepped down because of his health. He wanted the Conservative party to adopt the slogan "Keep England White." (1)
A hero against mass immigration in the early 1950s was the fifth Marquess of Salisbury, grand son of the great Conservative Prime Minister and descendant of Lord Burleigh adviser to Queen Elizabeth.
He fought his battles in Cabinet. A letter preserved at the National Archive written to Viscount Swinton in 1954, shows his standpoint. Swinton like others only wanted the powers to deport criminals, sick immigrants and charges on the state but Salisbury was deeper and wiser than that and foretold: “I should not be satisfied with the legislation which you suggest. I feel that it would only be tinkering with what is really becoming a fundamental problem for us all, though it is only beginning to push its ugly head above the surface of politics. The figures which we have been given make it clear that we are faced with a problem which, though at at present it may be only a cloud the size of a man’s hand, may easily come to fill the whole political horizon … Indeed, if something is not done to check it now, I should not be at all surprised if the problem became quite unmanageable in twenty or thirty years time. We might well be faced with very much the same type of appalling issue that is now causing such great difficulties for the United States. The main causes of this sudden inflow of blacks is of course the Welfare State. So long as the antiquated rule obtains that any British subject can come into this country without any limitation at all, these people will pour in to take advantage of our social services and other amenities and we shall have no protection at all.”
Oliver Lyttletton (later Lord Chandos) wanted to introduce deposits of £500 to be put down by immigrants: “ if there is to be means of controlling the increasing flow of coloured people who come here largely to enjoy the benefits of the Welfare State.”
He had a list of all restrictions imposed on Britons by other Commonwealth countries who refused to accept “persons who are likely to become a public charge,” illiterates”, those deemed “undesirable” had “unsuitable standards or habits of life” many had quota systems and even dictation tests. Jamaica prohibited those likely “to become a charge on public funds by reason of infirmity of body or mind or ill-health or who is not in possession of sufficient means to support himself or such of his dependents as he shall bring with him to the island”.
Thirty–nine territories had entry permit systems or required prospective residents to first obtain permission. Lyttleton letter to Swinton 31/3/1954. We alone allowed anyone in.
Conservative Cyril Osborne (Louth) first tried in 1954 to introduce a bill to control immigration under the 10 minute rule. Before it got to Parliament the Commonwealth Affairs committee had 17 present when 14 spoke and only one supported the bill.
In May 1958, 3 months before the racial battles of Notting Hill and Nottingham Osborne had written to Labour leader Hugh Gaitskill who handed it to his secretary to reply, “The Labour Party is opposed to restriction of immigration as every Commonwealth citizen has the right as a British subject to enter this country.” Then 3 months after He instigated a Commons debate on the 5th of December 1958 when Labour spokesman Arthur Bottomley stated, “We are categorically against it (restrictions).” Supporting Osborne Labour’s Frank Tomney, remarked on elected representatives ignoring their constituents. “We have been sent here by the electorate to give expression to issues which concern them.”
His sincerity was clear. After vainly pleading with the Conservative backbench 1922 committee to consider the consequences of uncontrolled immigration, he broke down and wept. At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration bill (1961) he stated, “The world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.”
Norman Pannell Conservative member for Liverpool (Kirkdale) served in the Nigerian Legislature and lived in Africa for over 10 years. He proposed a motion at the 1958 Tory conference for reciprocal rights of entry with other Commonwealth countries, for the U.K. had an open door policy and let anyone in. “When I visited Nigeria two years ago as a member of Parliament without ultimate responsibility for the affairs of the that country, I was given an entry permit valid for 14 days and renewable subject to good behaviour.” He also addressed the 1961 conference on the perils of admitting criminals and the sick. The debate was stage-managed to stop Cyril Osborne speaking who stood outside in the rain handing out off-prints of a letter of his from the morning’s Telegraph. Pannell stated that though Butler had disagreed with limiting numbers, had agreed with his suggestion of deporting immigrants who commit crimes but nothing had been done.
There is the importation of diseases which puts the population at risk. In a letter to the Times of 13th December 1960, Harold Gurden wrote, “On the health question we find the middle ring of the city(Birmingham), where immigrants are mainly concentrated, heavily peppered with dots of tuberculosis incidence. It is the opinion of medical officers that at least some immigrants are suffering with this disease before entering the country...We have a duty to our constituents.”
In 2007 it has been revealed that we have a record number of cases of TB. This has been imported by our authorities.
When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; now they regularly have to shoot people in the street, we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.
At a Society For Individual freedom meeting at Birmingham Town Hall, on 18 4 1968, 2 days before Enoch’s famous Rivers of Blood speech, Sir Ronald Bell warned of the forthcoming Race Relations Act, "I am profoundly convinced that if this immediate threat is not sharply challenged and then fought with as great a persistence as has been shown over recent years by those who have worked for this engine of oppression, then many further uses of law and of the power of the state for shaping men’s minds will follow.”
To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms.
K. Harvey Proctor addressed the 1983 Conservative party conference ,but no senior party member sat on the platform apart from a glum looking John Biffen who only clapped sparely.
Mrs Thatcher was not present.
In 1981 Proctor had announced a plan by the Monday club Immigration and Repatriation Committee to repatriate 50,000 immigrants a year. The forward to the document was by Sir Ronald Bell.
At a Monday Club dinner in early 1984 guest of honour Enoch Powell revealed that the Conservative party had threatened to not speak to Proctor for his belief in repatriation which would have been the first time in their history they had sent one of their MP’s to Coventry!
In his outstanding book “The Unarmed Invasion”(1965) Lord Elton wrote,” We seem to be re-enacting the story of the Roman Empire, which in its decadence imported subject races to do the menial tasks.” In his autobiography the great Rock guitarist Eric Clapton tells of adverts he saw while touring Jamaica for immigrants to come here and how clear it was that they were being brought here as cheap labour.
They are there now because our rulers are on their side against us. The Saudi monarchy are building The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies (OCIS), founded in 1985, Prince Charles is its honorary patron. It is the biggest Muslim educational centre in the United Kingdom and built as a traditional Oxford college around a central cloistered quadrangle. The 10,230 sq m four-storey building will feature study and research facilities, a lecture theatre, a large library and an environmentally controlled archive for rare documents; a prayer hall with traditional dome and minaret tower. The centre includes a 108-foot-high minaret and a 75-foot-high dome. It is estimated at £65 million. We remember that this traitorous university is pushing us out of there in favour of overseas students. As reported in the Independent 21 April 2004.
A TV poll marking 40 years since Enoch’s 'Rivers of Blood' speech found most people anticipate racial conflict over the years to come. The unprecedented level of prosperity Europe has enjoyed for years that has prevented the civil unrest but we are now heading into recession. In an echo of Enoch’s warnings on “racial civil war” The Sunday Times of June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, one of Britain’s most senior military strategists warned that western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire.
He said future migrations would be comparable to the Goths and Vandals while north African “barbary” pirates could be attacking yachts and beaches in the Mediterranean within 10 years.
Europe, including Britain, could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight.
We never asked if we wanted, this invasion, not by proud conquering warlords, but by cringing Third World masses with whom we have nothing in common but the elites wanted for cheap labour and to expiate their historic guilt, while they lived peacefully in fine areas.
The words of these heroes became reality on 7 July 2005 when 52 victims of Third World immigration were blown up in of London. Enoch had told the Southall Chamber of Commerce on 4th November 1971, “Yet it is more truly when he looks into the eyes of Asia that the Englishman comes face to face with those who will dispute with him possession of his native land.”
As Stanley Baldwin, three times Prime Minister, said On May 24 1929:“Let us keep this thought ever in our mind: “that each one of us, so far as in him lies, will strive to keep these islands a fit nursery for Our Race”.
(1) Peter Hennessy, 'Having It So Good - Britain in the Fifties' (Allen Lane, 2006) p 224
Hennessy's reference is: Peter Catterall (ed.), 'The Macmillan Diaries: The Cabinet Years, 1950-1957' (Macmillan, 2003) p 382.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
