I recently wrote about a politically interested judiciary attacking our ways and importing terrorists now I want to give an introduction to how young British people are being neutralised to prevent them defending themselves from colonisation. (1)
Since the rise to power of the New Left, in the 1960 - 70.s, education has been gradually changed from developing the child’s abilities to instilling the correct attitudes. There has been a change in what is taught and how it is taught. In the Liberal system education imparted the Liberal internal dialectic which is the way people reasoned within liberal parameters. You took pro and contra views and discussed their merits to reach a conclusion like finding truth through discussion.
But “Cultural Marxist” education abandons education for inculcating the correct opinions and attitudes to create an accepting frame of mind for contemporary “anti-racist” ideology. For example, only selected topics can be taught in history with the Second World War dominant because the fight with Nazism is used to stigmatise people who are trying to save their country as racists and frighten children away from Nationalist sentiments. They also teach Henry VIII to show tyranny and anti-feminism.
The surrender to Islam and the new anti-Semitism of Muslims is evident in education. A Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are abandoning teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils whose do not believe the Holocaust happened and are frightened to teach the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques. They also teach a version of the development of slavery, which omits the much longer and harsher Muslim slave trade to inculcate guilt in White children to control them. (2)
Yet, children could be taught sex education from the age of four, under plans by MPs The Daily Mail of 27th August revealed. They want the Government to make advice pregnancy rate, which is among the highest in Europe. Sexually transmitted diseases are becoming increasingly prevalent among youngsters after being brought from Africa by immigrants. But rather than face this up to this a group of MPs led by Chris Bryant, parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, says that the solution is to educate children more about sex education from a much earlier age. "Bryant is openly homosexual and BBC News reported on 2nd December 2003 he apologised for e-mailing a picture of himself in his underpants via a gay website. From 1994 to 1996 he was London manager of Common Purpose the controversial charity."
The MPs claim that this is not enough and that children should be given relationship advice 'in context' if they are to make informed decisions about when to have sex. Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to heterosexual relations. This ignores the essential duty to re-produce. Propagandising homosexuality is a threat to our demographics. (3)
My young niece looked at herself sidelong in a mirror and you could see the woman in her. Teaching her about sex would be wicked as she would not understand the words and putting this in her head could lead her to say things about adults without knowing what she was saying. The idea is the train people to have the type of relationships approved of by adherents to the dominant ideology of “Equality” and “anti racism.” They also teach about contraception and sexually transmitted diseases which is compulsory in primary and secondary schools.
Even worse, The Daily Mail of 22 August 2008, reported that almost a quarter of all babies in Britain are now born to immigrant mothers. In London the figure is 54 per cent, rising to 75 per cent in some boroughs....A report revealed that one in eight pupils speaks English as a second language...MPs and unions have called for urgent action to prevent schools being overwhelmed by the pressure. Migrant children take longer to understand lessons and divert the teacher's energies from other pupils.
In 1965 Peter Griffiths Conservative MP for Smethwick called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused of wanting to start apartheid in schools. Children are withdrawn for, bullying, unhappiness, failure to cater for SEN, or problems with teaching style and the curriculum but now we have to save our children from state manipulation.
The uniting of Capitalism with revised Marxism, Cultural Marxism.
Revisionists like Gramsci had realised that the working classes were not following Marx and the way to subvert Western civilisation was through the culture. They took over education and teachers training colleges and also jettisoned Marx’s economic arguments leaving the way open for corporations to use group rights in their entitlements programmes couched in politically correct language and sponsor fashionable causes. In the 1960’s the watchwords of The New Left were “Everything is political” and “The personal is political.” They wanted to “change attitudes” and “ consciousness.” These are the seeds of the nascent totalitarian state we are in. (4)
You may well wonder how these totalitarian ideas caught on! They were originally presented as “Liberal” - “new Liberalism” as opposed to “old Liberalism.” Traditional liberal beliefs like individual rights were replaced by group rights for specially designated victims and these were racial, gender and sexual orientation privileges.
What was known as identity politics was an inversion of Hitler’s persecution of different races, homosexuals and gypsies. These groups are beneficiaries of official prejudices over Hitlers favourite group Whites! Even now people who advocate Political Correctness describe themselves as liberal and think they are tolerant!
Cultural Marxism (rather Cultural Nazism against us) is a total ideological system, imposing or manipulating opinions for all aspects of life . It is a version of Stalin's Russia. This process begins with children at school and operates on different levels. It is not just minds to be controlled. Like the Communist states they want physical control and the means to correct ideological error. This is being implemented now and there have been warning signs:
The State holds DNA records of nearly a million children, some as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Each week 20 schools introduce fingerprinting. Ostensibly this helps them develop a love of books and reading. It replaces library cards by the child's fingerprint and placing the print on a scanner opens their computer file with records of the books they have borrowed. Minister for Schools and Learning, Jim Knight, revealed that when working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a whiz with a computer could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft.
In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.
Leo McKinsty commented on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools…The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated. Excellence should not be encouraged for fear of lowering the self-esteem of those who lag behind… there is the growing feminisation of the teaching profession, where more than 90 per cent of primary school teachers and 60 per cent of secondary teachers are women - a development that again leaves many sporty boys unchallenged.”
The new elites undermine male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are stigmatised as oppressors our children are oppressed at school by telling them their clothes or views could offend the privileged groups. This means is moulding children into the correct way of acting and talking.
A notorious example was reported by The Times of 7 march 2006: "Traditional nursery rhymes are being rewritten at nursery schools to avoid causing offence to children. Instead of singing "Baa baa, black sheep" as generations of children have learnt to do, toddlers in Oxfordshire are being taught to sing "Baa baa, rainbow sheep". A spokesman for Ofsted, the watchdog which inspects Sure Start centres, confirmed that centres are expected to "have regard to anti-discrimination good practice" and that staff should "actively promote equality of opportunity. They are trying to destroy Christmas. This is the Soviet technique of making reality into what you wish it was.
The Daily Mail of 11th December 2006:"It is the time of year when parents and grandparents look forward to seeing their children dressed up as Mary and Joseph or the Three Wise Men. But the traditional Nativity play at Knowland Grove Community First School in Norwich has been axed in favour of a celebration of a range of different faiths."
But the most alarming was in the Telegraph of 8 July 2008. The National Children's Bureau guidance to play leaders and nursery teachers advising them to look racist incidents among youngster’s in their care. This could be a child of three who says "yuk" to unfamiliar foreign food. The guidance is designed to highlight potentially-racist attitudes in youngsters from a young age. It alerts playgroup leaders that even babies can not be ignored in the drive to root out prejudice as they can "recognise different people in their lives". The NCB receives £12 million a year, mainly from Government funded organisations and therefore the tax payer is having money taken to pay for their own children to be moulded by brainwashing into what the Cultural Marxist elites want them to be.
The authorities are tightening their control of children.
The school leaving age is to be raised to 18 making more time for state parenting as in school holiday clubs and breakfast clubs. This is to condition them for being monitored 24 hours a day in the E.U.
Home educating parents receive income support until their youngest child is 16. But new legislation comes into force and when the youngest child is 12, income support will be replaced with job seeker's allowance and the parents have to seek work. In 2010 the age limit for the youngest child will be reduced to 7 years old. The totalitarians want to take control of children.
There is legislation to force home educating parents to get a job and send their children to school. It costs about £5,000 per year to keep a child at school so this is not an economic decision but a political one. The government should give home schoolers a tax deduction to the same value of sending their child to a state school. A voucher scheme would allow parents to either home school and use the voucher to pay for necessities like books, or, to send their children to state or public school and re-deem the voucher against the cost. Universities are open to Home Schooled children.
Home schooling families could get together to form Home school co-ops. These groups could meet weekly to provide a classroom. They are support families who link to share their abilities and resources and broaden the children's education. This enables children to do science experiments, art projects, spelling bees, discussions; use museums, community centres, athletic clubs, after-school programs, churches, science preserves, parks, and other community resources. There are sports fields and leisure centres to use. By forming groups we could get discounts for block bookings. Secondary school level students may take classes at community colleges, which typically have open admission policies. Parents could work as volunteers.
The one deep fear the elites have is “White man” turning so they want to take stronger control of children. If we awaken all this evil control will be swept aside as we are still numerically stronger and have great and noble traditions of winning wars that seemed lost.
(1) http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/01/political-judges-at-war-with-britain.html
(2) http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/03/myths-behind-white-guilt.html
(3) http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2008/12/paedophile-supporters-defeat-bnp-in.html
http://newportcity.blogspot.com/2010/01/chris-bryant-minister-for-underpants.html
(4)
http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/index.php/writers/reconquista/1425-marxism-exposed-how-labour-and-the-tories-are-destroying-britain
For advice contact on Home Schooling: “Education Otherwise”.
An excellent article by Troy Southgate
http://www.dissidentcongress.com/index.php?page=articles/schooling.html
Two excellent books about PC written from a old liberal perspective are
"The Politics of the Forked Tongue" by Aidan Rankin (New European Publications)
"Retreat from Reason" by Anthony Browne (Civitas).
Monday 22 March 2010
Putting Meaning back into the World
In the undeclared war to replace British people and their culture with a multi-racial society the elites blame “Whites” for all evils including their own dispossession. They are scapegoats manipulated by guilt and blame themselves for corporations importing cheap labour. “We won’t do the dirty jobs” they have been trained to think by education and the media. This is hogwash for in reality if they refuse a job they lose their benefits.
Socialists live in the past instead of learning from history. The Jarrow Crusade is a famous and noble event in modern British history. It was a march of 200 unemployed men to parliament petitioning for assistance for those unemployed. There is a bridge over The Tyne to Newcastle being constructed and the French firm with the contract has imported most of the labour from France and other European countries yet I was told by the landlady of a pub near by:” The ones who complain are the ones who don’t want to work.”
They are kept passive with state benefits while in Jarrow, once again, a “high unemployment area,” work goes to foreigners. The re-development of Liverpool was carried out by largely imported cheap labour.
Modern ideas are formulated by unworldly academics when a practical activity like politics requires experience of life and a knowledge of human nature. A student of “Human Geography” told me she likes the exotic communities in her native London and visits for a meal or to watch a cultural show. But this is the surface of life; the deep side of life is rearing families and developing communities. She goes there as a spectator to sample delights and returns home like a tourist.
This shows how “progressives” see the situation as static but it is not it is dynamic. The immigrants have human nature like us and bring it with them. They replicate their cultures here and prosecute loyalties to their own and grudges against other groups which is why the immigration of Muslims is leading to attacks on Jewish people in Europe and as they grew stronger a New Holocaust which the elites are fostering. As I have written elsewhere, agreements like The European-Mediterranean Partnership heralds the New Holocaust and people of Jewish antecedents like Sarkozy and David Milliband are bringing it on their own people in Europe. Jewish communities must rebel against their myopic leaders to save themselves and their children.
The young student has been taught the Marxist idea that people are social constructs and have no essential human nature which is a new version of the old body and mind duality. Is the mind separate from the body? In fact the two interact with the male and female genes respectively affecting thought and behaviour patterns. Culture is also interactive. We create a culture through our genes and new generations are born into it and moulded by it.
This is at the heart of our loss of touch with reality. We are taught that men and women are empty vessels but in our private lives assess people we meet else get taken advantage of while our public lives are conducted in a naïve and unworldly way.
On the surface we are socially constructed as the young students views were, or in fashion which is different now from say 10 years ago, a century ago or 2,000 years ago; but human nature is produced by genetic inheritance and unchangeable or we would not understand classic literature and The Bible.
It had never occurred to her that we are being de-cultured. She had not heard this before and was perplexed and searching round to find a stereotype for me. Are you a racist? This is the negative category they have been trained to slot us into. Students are educated out of using natural common sense.
By pretending everyone is malleable with no essential human nature they convince themselves that all is under control and we are developing into a harmonious multi-racial utopia. This type of abstract thinking grew out of The Enlightenment and first showed its potential in The French Revolution.
The working classes have been trained by the media with constant slander (1)As far back as 1955 workers who tried to defend their jobs were suppressed by the state as the 1955 strike of bus workers in West Bromwich , in protest against the employment of an Indian conductor! When the National Health Service and London Transport were being developed if thy needed labour they should have improved conditions and increased pay structures not imported cheap labour. The British capitalist class have always done this and we read about Irish workers being imported to break strikes for better conditions in Mrs.Gaskell’s classic novel Mary Barton. They should learn from history after the trouble they caused by importing labour like Tamils into Sri Lanka to produce rubber.
On 20th January 1955 when immigration from Jamaica was 11,000 a year, Conservative Cyril Osborne(later knighted) had written to the London Times,” But the present West Indian and West African invasion is a mere trickle of what we must expect, because as the law now stands everyone born in the Commonwealth is entitled to come to this country. What shall we do when the millions living in the bigger areas decide to emigrate?” At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration Bill (1961) Osborne warned “that the world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.” Both sides of the House laughed at him and called him Fascist.” We are seeing this now with boats leaving Africa for Europe.
Eminent economist Professor Ezra Mishan exposed immigration as being about cheap labour in the 1960s. He wrote in The Salisbury Review in 1988: “Frequent claims that the new immigrants have in fact reduced the labour shortage in particular sectors of the economy – in particular, the apparent shortages of labour in transport, in nursing, and in what are popularly to be the more menial and less attractive occupations- are naïve. Managers of public services in Britain who, along with some private firms, sent agents to the West Indies in the 1950’s in order to recruit labour were only acting as good capitalists would in such circumstances – attracting lower-paid labour from outside their area in order to prevent wages from rising within it. If it was not for that wages would have risen.”
The elites are creating what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.” In November 2006 it emerged that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here. A Foreign Office pamphlet declares: 'Multicultural Britain - A Land of Immigrants'. It encourages immigrants to move here because of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world.
In a book review for the Salisbury Review of Spring 2003 Sir Alfred Sherman, former senior advisor to Mrs Thatcher and leader writer on the Jewish Chronicle, recalled a friend in race relations had asked him to take a look at the reception areas of Deptford and Southall in the mid 60’s, “ I was horrified. My natural vague sympathies for the immigrants, strangers in a foreign land, was replaced by strong but hopeless sympathy for the British victims of mass immigration, whose home areas were being occupied. I was made aware of a disquieting evolution in “Establishment” attitudes towards what they called immigration or race relations and I dubbed “colonialisation.” The well-being and rights of immigrants and ethnic minorities had become paramount. The British working classes, hitherto the object of demonstrative solicitude by particularly the New Establishment on the left, but the working classes had acquired new status as the enemy, damned by the all-purpose pejorative “racists.” The transformation of Southall was brought about by Wolf’s rubber factory encouraging workers from India.
They use abstract pejoratives to justify doing the opposite. The new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression as part of their feminisation programme. Leo McKinsty commented on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated.
The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school as children are told their views could be offensive. What this really means is what they are doing does not fit into to the totalitarian ideological orthodoxy.
Old fashioned categories like opposing immigration are no longer applicable because massive and uncontrolled immigration for social engineering and cheap labour take our territory so we are actually defending ourselves against colonisation.
When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.
To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms. Sir Ronald Bell told W.I.S.E. in 1981: “… a discriminating person was someone to be admired. People have been brainwashed into thinking that it is a bad word except when native inhabitants are being handicapped. That is now called positive discrimination, and is deemed a good thing.”
We need to develop a new political vocabulary to express what is happening to us and how we see the world and describe human nature and why this rules out a successful multi-racial society. The Welsh have it right in their great anthem “Land of my Fathers”. Country is vapid but land means something. The ruling bureaucrats of the E.U. and our regional Government are restricting our vocabularies through P.C. so that we speak and think in the way they want us to. We can not express our sufferings in PC terminology because the words are essentially biased against our interests like the young student who could not understand what I said but had to apply the connotative term “racist” to me. A connotative word carries a set of associations or connotations above the literal meaning. Only “Whites” are classed as racist!
The terms “narrow-minded” and “bigot” are only applied to traditional views while narrow-minded multi-racial bigots are presented as morally superior! I recently tried to talk to one from Bingham about villages becoming dormitory places where young locals could not afford to buy or rent property because of weekend dwellers. I asked what had caused it and he replied rich people from London and Manchester. I pointed out that in the big cities this is caused by pressure from asylum seekers and the birth rate of immigrants and that the government is bringing them at a rate of 1500 a day. I replied I get my information from government documents in The Public Records Office. This threatened his fixed view of the world and he stormed out of the room in a perfect show of “narrow-minded bigotry!”
Society is an old liberal term and we must speak of ourselves as “communities” and a British community. All communities grow out of collective human nature. Today's view of persons interacting in societies originated with Enlightenment philosophy - people are equal, interchangeable units of production and consumption with differences of race, nationality, culture, gender and ability seen as social constructs and impediments to social harmony.
Real people are not abstractions like “equals” or “humanity” but Englishmen and Frenchmen and women, Indians etc. Burke, Thucydides and Confucius all stressed the importance of human nature. Our loyalties like those of immigrants” … begin (with) our public affections in our families... we pass on to our neighbourhoods" this expands outwards to our nation. Men and women have distinctive and individual identities within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin above strangers and this affects the type of community we create.
The family, locality and nation, are parts of a natural, organic state as opposed to an artificial one based on planning. The French Revolution, like the Soviet, Maoist and Cambodian, were attempts to recreate human nature and refashion a people. The modern world is dominated by artificial empires, Global corporations and bureaucracies, which treat human beings as abstract entities. However, tribalism is returning and the future belongs to these human scale structures which develop over time not instant and artificial creations.
Burke’s famous definition of society is that it was a continuous community of the living, the dead and those who are yet to be born. Each man and woman is part of a larger body. The individual dies, but descendents live on. Tradition is a surer guide to action than abstract reason and our parents advice received from their parents before them is better than a rationalist formulae in a “How to …book.” Modern society believes change is always better than what exists and the past is obsolete. But we inherit what we are and what have from our ancestors and have a duty to pass it on to our descendents not dissipate amongst the rest of the world.
A nation's manners, its morals, its religions and political institutions, its social structure, are inherited from ancestors and grow out of the character of the people at that time. Government from Brussels, economic control by Global corporations, and Afro-Asian colonization is part of a new dream for an ideal future; but in practice it is disinheriting our children to whom we are morally obliged to pass on the inheritance.
It is the ceding of territory to the colonialists that shows the weakness and effeteness of our rulers. Throughout history wars have been fought for territory and by allowing newcomers to stake claims our girly elites are encouraging them to fight for more. In The territorial Imperative Robert Ardry explains how much having a country has boosted Israelis. Our rulers are doing this for invaders and this changes our relationship to them.
We obliged to put our nation first, as we do with our families, even when outsiders and foreigners are more in need of our help. Charity should begin at home but if people wish to donate money to foreign causes they should be allowed to do so but supporting outsiders against our own kind is a moral evil.
_____________________
1) This is a classic piece of propaganda from contractor UK for cheap labour that blames the workers for the corporations using cheap labour.
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/002578.html
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=401211&in_page_id=2
Socialists live in the past instead of learning from history. The Jarrow Crusade is a famous and noble event in modern British history. It was a march of 200 unemployed men to parliament petitioning for assistance for those unemployed. There is a bridge over The Tyne to Newcastle being constructed and the French firm with the contract has imported most of the labour from France and other European countries yet I was told by the landlady of a pub near by:” The ones who complain are the ones who don’t want to work.”
They are kept passive with state benefits while in Jarrow, once again, a “high unemployment area,” work goes to foreigners. The re-development of Liverpool was carried out by largely imported cheap labour.
Modern ideas are formulated by unworldly academics when a practical activity like politics requires experience of life and a knowledge of human nature. A student of “Human Geography” told me she likes the exotic communities in her native London and visits for a meal or to watch a cultural show. But this is the surface of life; the deep side of life is rearing families and developing communities. She goes there as a spectator to sample delights and returns home like a tourist.
This shows how “progressives” see the situation as static but it is not it is dynamic. The immigrants have human nature like us and bring it with them. They replicate their cultures here and prosecute loyalties to their own and grudges against other groups which is why the immigration of Muslims is leading to attacks on Jewish people in Europe and as they grew stronger a New Holocaust which the elites are fostering. As I have written elsewhere, agreements like The European-Mediterranean Partnership heralds the New Holocaust and people of Jewish antecedents like Sarkozy and David Milliband are bringing it on their own people in Europe. Jewish communities must rebel against their myopic leaders to save themselves and their children.
The young student has been taught the Marxist idea that people are social constructs and have no essential human nature which is a new version of the old body and mind duality. Is the mind separate from the body? In fact the two interact with the male and female genes respectively affecting thought and behaviour patterns. Culture is also interactive. We create a culture through our genes and new generations are born into it and moulded by it.
This is at the heart of our loss of touch with reality. We are taught that men and women are empty vessels but in our private lives assess people we meet else get taken advantage of while our public lives are conducted in a naïve and unworldly way.
On the surface we are socially constructed as the young students views were, or in fashion which is different now from say 10 years ago, a century ago or 2,000 years ago; but human nature is produced by genetic inheritance and unchangeable or we would not understand classic literature and The Bible.
It had never occurred to her that we are being de-cultured. She had not heard this before and was perplexed and searching round to find a stereotype for me. Are you a racist? This is the negative category they have been trained to slot us into. Students are educated out of using natural common sense.
By pretending everyone is malleable with no essential human nature they convince themselves that all is under control and we are developing into a harmonious multi-racial utopia. This type of abstract thinking grew out of The Enlightenment and first showed its potential in The French Revolution.
The working classes have been trained by the media with constant slander (1)As far back as 1955 workers who tried to defend their jobs were suppressed by the state as the 1955 strike of bus workers in West Bromwich , in protest against the employment of an Indian conductor! When the National Health Service and London Transport were being developed if thy needed labour they should have improved conditions and increased pay structures not imported cheap labour. The British capitalist class have always done this and we read about Irish workers being imported to break strikes for better conditions in Mrs.Gaskell’s classic novel Mary Barton. They should learn from history after the trouble they caused by importing labour like Tamils into Sri Lanka to produce rubber.
On 20th January 1955 when immigration from Jamaica was 11,000 a year, Conservative Cyril Osborne(later knighted) had written to the London Times,” But the present West Indian and West African invasion is a mere trickle of what we must expect, because as the law now stands everyone born in the Commonwealth is entitled to come to this country. What shall we do when the millions living in the bigger areas decide to emigrate?” At the second reading of the Commonwealth Immigration Bill (1961) Osborne warned “that the world’s poor would swarm to Britain’s welfare honey pot. We have neither the room nor the resources to take all who would like to come.” Both sides of the House laughed at him and called him Fascist.” We are seeing this now with boats leaving Africa for Europe.
Eminent economist Professor Ezra Mishan exposed immigration as being about cheap labour in the 1960s. He wrote in The Salisbury Review in 1988: “Frequent claims that the new immigrants have in fact reduced the labour shortage in particular sectors of the economy – in particular, the apparent shortages of labour in transport, in nursing, and in what are popularly to be the more menial and less attractive occupations- are naïve. Managers of public services in Britain who, along with some private firms, sent agents to the West Indies in the 1950’s in order to recruit labour were only acting as good capitalists would in such circumstances – attracting lower-paid labour from outside their area in order to prevent wages from rising within it. If it was not for that wages would have risen.”
The elites are creating what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.” In November 2006 it emerged that the Government were advertising for immigrants to come here. A Foreign Office pamphlet declares: 'Multicultural Britain - A Land of Immigrants'. It encourages immigrants to move here because of the preferential treatment they get under the Human Rights Act and well-paid jobs. The Foreign Office put it in embassies across the world.
In a book review for the Salisbury Review of Spring 2003 Sir Alfred Sherman, former senior advisor to Mrs Thatcher and leader writer on the Jewish Chronicle, recalled a friend in race relations had asked him to take a look at the reception areas of Deptford and Southall in the mid 60’s, “ I was horrified. My natural vague sympathies for the immigrants, strangers in a foreign land, was replaced by strong but hopeless sympathy for the British victims of mass immigration, whose home areas were being occupied. I was made aware of a disquieting evolution in “Establishment” attitudes towards what they called immigration or race relations and I dubbed “colonialisation.” The well-being and rights of immigrants and ethnic minorities had become paramount. The British working classes, hitherto the object of demonstrative solicitude by particularly the New Establishment on the left, but the working classes had acquired new status as the enemy, damned by the all-purpose pejorative “racists.” The transformation of Southall was brought about by Wolf’s rubber factory encouraging workers from India.
They use abstract pejoratives to justify doing the opposite. The new elites detest competition and advocate co-operation to suppress male aggression as part of their feminisation programme. Leo McKinsty commented on our Olympic achievements in the Daily Mail of 20 August 2008: "Over the past weekend, our sailors, cyclists, swimmers and rowers won an unprecedented eight gold medals, by far the greatest haul by Britons in two days in a century of Olympic competition...Of the 14 heroes pictured on the front page of yesterday's Mail, six were educated at independent schools… nor is this some statistical anomaly. The disproportionate Olympic success of privately educated contestants has been an enduring pattern in recent years....Equality of outcome is the central theme of the politically correct British state. The concept of a talented elite is despised rather than celebrated.
The new elites loathe male authority and attack masculinity as patriarchy. They see the main enemy as white racism and this justifies disadvantaging white pupils. No other ethnic group can be racist because they are sentimentally categorised as victims of our oppression and require "special needs". While we are blamed as oppressors we are being oppressed at school as children are told their views could be offensive. What this really means is what they are doing does not fit into to the totalitarian ideological orthodoxy.
Old fashioned categories like opposing immigration are no longer applicable because massive and uncontrolled immigration for social engineering and cheap labour take our territory so we are actually defending ourselves against colonisation.
When we were homogeneous we trusted one another and the police did not need to be armed; we are in a surveillance state and have totalitarian race laws to oppress us.
To control thought totalitarians redefine words and change the meaning of legal terms. Sir Ronald Bell told W.I.S.E. in 1981: “… a discriminating person was someone to be admired. People have been brainwashed into thinking that it is a bad word except when native inhabitants are being handicapped. That is now called positive discrimination, and is deemed a good thing.”
We need to develop a new political vocabulary to express what is happening to us and how we see the world and describe human nature and why this rules out a successful multi-racial society. The Welsh have it right in their great anthem “Land of my Fathers”. Country is vapid but land means something. The ruling bureaucrats of the E.U. and our regional Government are restricting our vocabularies through P.C. so that we speak and think in the way they want us to. We can not express our sufferings in PC terminology because the words are essentially biased against our interests like the young student who could not understand what I said but had to apply the connotative term “racist” to me. A connotative word carries a set of associations or connotations above the literal meaning. Only “Whites” are classed as racist!
The terms “narrow-minded” and “bigot” are only applied to traditional views while narrow-minded multi-racial bigots are presented as morally superior! I recently tried to talk to one from Bingham about villages becoming dormitory places where young locals could not afford to buy or rent property because of weekend dwellers. I asked what had caused it and he replied rich people from London and Manchester. I pointed out that in the big cities this is caused by pressure from asylum seekers and the birth rate of immigrants and that the government is bringing them at a rate of 1500 a day. I replied I get my information from government documents in The Public Records Office. This threatened his fixed view of the world and he stormed out of the room in a perfect show of “narrow-minded bigotry!”
Society is an old liberal term and we must speak of ourselves as “communities” and a British community. All communities grow out of collective human nature. Today's view of persons interacting in societies originated with Enlightenment philosophy - people are equal, interchangeable units of production and consumption with differences of race, nationality, culture, gender and ability seen as social constructs and impediments to social harmony.
Real people are not abstractions like “equals” or “humanity” but Englishmen and Frenchmen and women, Indians etc. Burke, Thucydides and Confucius all stressed the importance of human nature. Our loyalties like those of immigrants” … begin (with) our public affections in our families... we pass on to our neighbourhoods" this expands outwards to our nation. Men and women have distinctive and individual identities within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin above strangers and this affects the type of community we create.
The family, locality and nation, are parts of a natural, organic state as opposed to an artificial one based on planning. The French Revolution, like the Soviet, Maoist and Cambodian, were attempts to recreate human nature and refashion a people. The modern world is dominated by artificial empires, Global corporations and bureaucracies, which treat human beings as abstract entities. However, tribalism is returning and the future belongs to these human scale structures which develop over time not instant and artificial creations.
Burke’s famous definition of society is that it was a continuous community of the living, the dead and those who are yet to be born. Each man and woman is part of a larger body. The individual dies, but descendents live on. Tradition is a surer guide to action than abstract reason and our parents advice received from their parents before them is better than a rationalist formulae in a “How to …book.” Modern society believes change is always better than what exists and the past is obsolete. But we inherit what we are and what have from our ancestors and have a duty to pass it on to our descendents not dissipate amongst the rest of the world.
A nation's manners, its morals, its religions and political institutions, its social structure, are inherited from ancestors and grow out of the character of the people at that time. Government from Brussels, economic control by Global corporations, and Afro-Asian colonization is part of a new dream for an ideal future; but in practice it is disinheriting our children to whom we are morally obliged to pass on the inheritance.
It is the ceding of territory to the colonialists that shows the weakness and effeteness of our rulers. Throughout history wars have been fought for territory and by allowing newcomers to stake claims our girly elites are encouraging them to fight for more. In The territorial Imperative Robert Ardry explains how much having a country has boosted Israelis. Our rulers are doing this for invaders and this changes our relationship to them.
We obliged to put our nation first, as we do with our families, even when outsiders and foreigners are more in need of our help. Charity should begin at home but if people wish to donate money to foreign causes they should be allowed to do so but supporting outsiders against our own kind is a moral evil.
_____________________
1) This is a classic piece of propaganda from contractor UK for cheap labour that blames the workers for the corporations using cheap labour.
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/002578.html
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=401211&in_page_id=2
I Am the Slime Oozing Out From Your TV Set
In the comparatively innocent days of 1972, “I am the Slime oozing out From Your TV Set” by Frank Zappa was an attack on capitalist control of people through television. A lot has come into the light since 1972 and we are now aware of the real nature of the war being waged against us by the ruling elites using psychological manipulation instead of declaring war. It is done by deceit; free speech and thinking is suppressed to further the fantasy of everyone uniting in worldwide racial harmony and moving populations around for the practical purpose of cheap labour. There is always a gap between the ideals and reality.
The Sun online on January 14th, reported that the British government has published guidelines for the media calling for certain words to be dropped and the suppression of stories about non-white crime. Words to be suppressed: “immigrant,” “illegal immigrant,” “illegal asylum seeker,” “bogus asylum seeker,” “non-white,” “non-Christian,” “mixed race,” “half-caste,” “mulatto.”
Further, people must not be identified by race or religion. (Race and religion are the bedrock of identity). The media is told to give racial minorities preferential treatment in hiring to have a more “multi-racial” staff. They are told to portray ethnic minorities in a more positive light. When discussing public opinion always use quotes from ethnic minorities. Follow their taboos: learn what local ethnic minorities don’t like and then omit these things from your paper.
Encourage White Britons to embrace elements of third world immigrant cultures. Promote and glorify the holidays, customs, and religious beliefs of non-white immigrant cultures.
Expose “racists.” The government document explicitly tells those in the media to portray minorities in a more positive light while holding white “racists” up to ridicule. The guidelines are not a legal requirement but people are already prosecuted for so-called “hate speech” - speaking out against Islamic immigration.
We are being brainwashed by the schools and the media into unnatural ways of thinking and acting. Schools as "re-education" camps like the American programme to re-educate Germany after the war led by Frankfurt School guru Theodore Adorno.
We have to be very clear about the intentions of the elites who are trying to destroy us. While this propaganda is used to pacify us for our demise they are also bringing people in to push us out of our communities. This is an attempt to dispossess the indigenous people of Britain and replace us with what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.”
The Dail Mail of 23rd February: “Labour encouraged mass immigration even though it knew that people opposed it, and that is an attack on the people. Whitehall documents show. The trick that has been used to shame us into being pushed out was deliberately employed again. The propaganda was the public disagreed with immigration because of 'racism' and ministers were told to try to alter public attitudes.” This is what has been going on since the 1960s.
“The thinking on immigration among Labour leaders was set down in 2000 in a document prepared for the Cabinet Office and the Home Office, but the key passages were suppressed before it was published. The paper was finally disclosed under freedom of information rules. It showed that ministers were advised that only the ill-educated and those who had never met a migrant were opposed to immigration. They were also told that large-scale immigration would bring increases in crime, but they concealed these concerns from the public. These have showed that Labour aimed to use immigration not only for economic reasons but also to change the social make-up of the country”
Ebay banned the sale of a “Dads army” game because it mentions Nazis and is therefore “racially offensive”! We are being controlled in our thoughts and in our actions, subliminally, but that will change as people become more conditioned and indoctrinated school leavers enter the herd. We live in a sterilised world that hates individualism and non conformity. Everyone has to think the correct things – dissent is not tolerated.
I was in Cambridge and Cheltenham libraries where they allow people to eat while using the computers and censor what political or cultural sites people can read. When I told an official at Cambridge that it is disgusting to have to listen to people eating while using a computer, she replied: ”We are trying to be inclusive”! This is an everyday example of how impractical the dominant ideology is. Food can damage computers and could also spread infections if undetected in the keyboard! They mindlessly follow current political fashion and fear thinking for themselves.
One of the media for manipulating people is advertising. "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony)" was a major hit from a 1971 Coca Cola television commercial. The song ostensibly sends a message of multi-racial harmony through multi racial collection of teenagers singing harmoniously on top of a hill. But another motive was opening up world markets. In the eighties Coca Cola became the identity of American cultural imperialism under the name “Coca Colonisation.” Wiser now we realise that the U.S. was herself under attack from Globalists.
Another “The united colours of Benneton” showed youths of every colour singing in unison. The idea was to subvert stereotypes but race and behaviour are not stereotypes – they are real! The adverts follow the Soviet principle of showing things how elites wish they were - happy multiracial societies. Attempts to force different types of people together leads to misery as in the South African Rainbow nation where, since its inauguration, at least 3091 White South African farmers have been genocidally murdered, but this is kept out of the media.
Benetton’s actual products were left out of the advertisements for pure political propaganda. These examples are of Capitalism and Communism uniting for the idealistic notion of a one world living in harmony and increased profits by breaking down boundaries.
In their own case though, Benetton bought Mapuche lands in Patagonia and evicted the Curiñanco-Nahuelquir family from their land after Benetton's claim to it, but the land was restored in 2007. They planned to use RFID tracking chips on clothes to monitor inventory. It is claimed the tracking chips "can be used to monitor the people wearing them." Benetton used to buy wool from farmers who practiced mulesing - a surgical operation that removes of strips of wool-bearing skin from around the buttocks. Since PETA threatened to boycott them Benetton now buys non mulesed wool and urges the wool industry to adopt the PETA and Australian Wool Growers Association agreement to end mulesing.
Revisionists like Gramsci had realised that the working classes were not following Marx and the way to subvert Western civilisation was through the culture. They took over education and teachers training colleges and also jettisoned Marx’s economic arguments leaving the way open for corporations to use group rights in their entitlements programmes couched in politically correct language and sponsor fashionable causes. In the 1960’s the slogans of The New Left were “Everything is political” and “The personal is political.” They wanted to “change attitudes” and “ consciousness.” These are the seeds of the nascent totalitarian state we are in.
In 1997 British Airways dropped the Union Flag from their aircraft but after protests reinstated it two years later.
A few years back there was an ad on the BBC about not paying the TV licence. The licence dodgers portrayed were white. The public information films and ads about swine flu depict only white people sneezing or wiping germs onto common surfaces etc. In one nauseating example a white man sneezes in a lift just before a black couple get in.
"Only fools and Horses" portrayed white muggers in the Batman and Robin episode. Michael Caine’s new film Brave Harry Brown depicts members of the gang he pursues as White to kid the public multi-racialism is not dysfunctional.
The soaps and dramas show what they wish was happening. An episode of Spooks depicted the “racist” harassing Indians. We see this with the projection of their aims in adverts like for dreams beds where a black man is shown with a White woman and this image is in very branch of my bank. They are trying to wipe Whites out.
We are constantly bombarded with campaigns to make us believe that 'ethnics' are part of our culture and heritage. History is rewritten, 'ethnic' actors enact roles in historical programmes to create the impression they have always been here, and children and unthinking adults sub consciously take this in.
The masses are diverted from reality by reality shows. These, coupled with a sophisticated conditioning campaign, ethnic minorities being shown positively in every advertisement, are lulling the population into believing that all in the garden is rosy when the threat to our civilisation is growing.
There is a photo showing Stephen Lawrence doing the black power fist but the establishment present him as a saint as they do Martin Luther King. Gang tribal wars are not helping. There is a huge amount of factual evidence that clearly shows the damage brought by immigrants to our society, but the moment a white British person mentions they are dehumanised by being labelled racist and persecuted.
There are no police checks on immigrants entering Britain , only when they commit a crime do the police check –it doesn't matter about the people who suffer at the hands of these criminals. The elites ignore our human rights.
A vehicle for mind altering is soaps. They present scenarios in which they play out the stereotypes of evil white racists and kindly, honest and capable blacks - constantly hammering home the ideology by auto-suggestion.
A perverted form is where young girls- who are avid TV watchers - are led astray by suggestions for how they should behave - what is acceptable in society, what is unacceptable. These "soaps" are supposed to reflect real life. The slime that is spewed out beggars belief.
TV teaches youngsters how to behave to be liked. There are programs to instruct you 'how to eat right, how to think right, how to exercise right, how to dress right and what sort of person is desirable.
TV also creates people’s belief of what is happening in the world. Eastenders some years ago showed two young white actresses mugging with violence a much respected elderly black actor, how often do you think this happens on our streets? I stopped watching TV because of how they portray the English. It is a revised-Marxist subversion of our values and traditions like our families and communities. All that gives our lives meaning must be destroyed for prospective multi racial utopia. Give up watching TV. It is easy: there are so many rewarding things to do, particularly with your children who need starting on the right path in this world of cultural elites corrupting the young.
The fact that the vast majority of racist violence is directed at whites is something which even the most brainwashed of liberals find difficult to refute so they keep it quiet.
The British crime survey 2006 shows that in the most serious categories of racial attacks- woundings and murders, out of 24,000 incidents, 20,000 were committed against whites. At the same time we are told we don't exist as a race. This Establishment ideology permeates everything while working towards a goal: to suppress, crush, humiliate, rob of identity, rob of respect and eradicate the true people of Britain - the new Kulak class!
Britain is reduced to warring tribes instead of a nation. As witnessed in towns and cities murder and stabbings are committed for no apparent reason. Most of these crimes are ethnic 'majorities' fighting for territory.
Reality differs vastly from the orthodox ideology that is propagandised. The importation of cheap labour from abroad puts our own people at a disadvantage but is hidden by the glossy Multi-Culti adverts. According to official statistics, one in five adults in Britain is out of work. These statistics reveal that there is well over 8 million people who are declared “economically inactive”, which is a record number according to the Office of National Statistics.
People who are labelled as “economically inactive” are students, the retired, parents who stay at home with children, the long term sick, and unsurprisingly, people who have simple given up looking for non-existent jobs. Before you get the wrong idea, the 8.05 million does not include the 2.46 million unemployed. When you add these together, it really puts things into perspective. Presently 21.2 per cent of the entire British adult population are out of work.
This revelation came as it was also claimed that the unemployment figure fell by 7,000 in the three months to November 2009, and now currently stands at 2.47 million.
In fact there are two main reasons why the figure has fallen: Firstly, people are becoming desperate and are willing to work for low pay and shorter hours to keep their jobs, which many families as a result will feel the impact of lower incomes for years to come, as a record breaking 1.03 million are working part time because it is impossible to secure full time work.
Secondly, the fall in unemployment is also a result of the rise in the “economically inactive” people, including school leavers who have chosen to go to college rather than spending many months looking for work which isn’t there.
And while the government try and improve their public image by boasting about the fall in unemployment families struggle on extremely low wages. What is even more worrying is that 27% of people who do have work, work in the public sector which is leading financial services at 16%.
The net increase in private sector jobs since 1997 is nil but 2.1 million jobs in the public sector were created, 1.2 million of which went to workers from overseas.
David Cox
The Sun online on January 14th, reported that the British government has published guidelines for the media calling for certain words to be dropped and the suppression of stories about non-white crime. Words to be suppressed: “immigrant,” “illegal immigrant,” “illegal asylum seeker,” “bogus asylum seeker,” “non-white,” “non-Christian,” “mixed race,” “half-caste,” “mulatto.”
Further, people must not be identified by race or religion. (Race and religion are the bedrock of identity). The media is told to give racial minorities preferential treatment in hiring to have a more “multi-racial” staff. They are told to portray ethnic minorities in a more positive light. When discussing public opinion always use quotes from ethnic minorities. Follow their taboos: learn what local ethnic minorities don’t like and then omit these things from your paper.
Encourage White Britons to embrace elements of third world immigrant cultures. Promote and glorify the holidays, customs, and religious beliefs of non-white immigrant cultures.
Expose “racists.” The government document explicitly tells those in the media to portray minorities in a more positive light while holding white “racists” up to ridicule. The guidelines are not a legal requirement but people are already prosecuted for so-called “hate speech” - speaking out against Islamic immigration.
We are being brainwashed by the schools and the media into unnatural ways of thinking and acting. Schools as "re-education" camps like the American programme to re-educate Germany after the war led by Frankfurt School guru Theodore Adorno.
We have to be very clear about the intentions of the elites who are trying to destroy us. While this propaganda is used to pacify us for our demise they are also bringing people in to push us out of our communities. This is an attempt to dispossess the indigenous people of Britain and replace us with what Marx called “A reserve army of labour.”
The Dail Mail of 23rd February: “Labour encouraged mass immigration even though it knew that people opposed it, and that is an attack on the people. Whitehall documents show. The trick that has been used to shame us into being pushed out was deliberately employed again. The propaganda was the public disagreed with immigration because of 'racism' and ministers were told to try to alter public attitudes.” This is what has been going on since the 1960s.
“The thinking on immigration among Labour leaders was set down in 2000 in a document prepared for the Cabinet Office and the Home Office, but the key passages were suppressed before it was published. The paper was finally disclosed under freedom of information rules. It showed that ministers were advised that only the ill-educated and those who had never met a migrant were opposed to immigration. They were also told that large-scale immigration would bring increases in crime, but they concealed these concerns from the public. These have showed that Labour aimed to use immigration not only for economic reasons but also to change the social make-up of the country”
Ebay banned the sale of a “Dads army” game because it mentions Nazis and is therefore “racially offensive”! We are being controlled in our thoughts and in our actions, subliminally, but that will change as people become more conditioned and indoctrinated school leavers enter the herd. We live in a sterilised world that hates individualism and non conformity. Everyone has to think the correct things – dissent is not tolerated.
I was in Cambridge and Cheltenham libraries where they allow people to eat while using the computers and censor what political or cultural sites people can read. When I told an official at Cambridge that it is disgusting to have to listen to people eating while using a computer, she replied: ”We are trying to be inclusive”! This is an everyday example of how impractical the dominant ideology is. Food can damage computers and could also spread infections if undetected in the keyboard! They mindlessly follow current political fashion and fear thinking for themselves.
One of the media for manipulating people is advertising. "I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony)" was a major hit from a 1971 Coca Cola television commercial. The song ostensibly sends a message of multi-racial harmony through multi racial collection of teenagers singing harmoniously on top of a hill. But another motive was opening up world markets. In the eighties Coca Cola became the identity of American cultural imperialism under the name “Coca Colonisation.” Wiser now we realise that the U.S. was herself under attack from Globalists.
Another “The united colours of Benneton” showed youths of every colour singing in unison. The idea was to subvert stereotypes but race and behaviour are not stereotypes – they are real! The adverts follow the Soviet principle of showing things how elites wish they were - happy multiracial societies. Attempts to force different types of people together leads to misery as in the South African Rainbow nation where, since its inauguration, at least 3091 White South African farmers have been genocidally murdered, but this is kept out of the media.
Benetton’s actual products were left out of the advertisements for pure political propaganda. These examples are of Capitalism and Communism uniting for the idealistic notion of a one world living in harmony and increased profits by breaking down boundaries.
In their own case though, Benetton bought Mapuche lands in Patagonia and evicted the Curiñanco-Nahuelquir family from their land after Benetton's claim to it, but the land was restored in 2007. They planned to use RFID tracking chips on clothes to monitor inventory. It is claimed the tracking chips "can be used to monitor the people wearing them." Benetton used to buy wool from farmers who practiced mulesing - a surgical operation that removes of strips of wool-bearing skin from around the buttocks. Since PETA threatened to boycott them Benetton now buys non mulesed wool and urges the wool industry to adopt the PETA and Australian Wool Growers Association agreement to end mulesing.
Revisionists like Gramsci had realised that the working classes were not following Marx and the way to subvert Western civilisation was through the culture. They took over education and teachers training colleges and also jettisoned Marx’s economic arguments leaving the way open for corporations to use group rights in their entitlements programmes couched in politically correct language and sponsor fashionable causes. In the 1960’s the slogans of The New Left were “Everything is political” and “The personal is political.” They wanted to “change attitudes” and “ consciousness.” These are the seeds of the nascent totalitarian state we are in.
In 1997 British Airways dropped the Union Flag from their aircraft but after protests reinstated it two years later.
A few years back there was an ad on the BBC about not paying the TV licence. The licence dodgers portrayed were white. The public information films and ads about swine flu depict only white people sneezing or wiping germs onto common surfaces etc. In one nauseating example a white man sneezes in a lift just before a black couple get in.
"Only fools and Horses" portrayed white muggers in the Batman and Robin episode. Michael Caine’s new film Brave Harry Brown depicts members of the gang he pursues as White to kid the public multi-racialism is not dysfunctional.
The soaps and dramas show what they wish was happening. An episode of Spooks depicted the “racist” harassing Indians. We see this with the projection of their aims in adverts like for dreams beds where a black man is shown with a White woman and this image is in very branch of my bank. They are trying to wipe Whites out.
We are constantly bombarded with campaigns to make us believe that 'ethnics' are part of our culture and heritage. History is rewritten, 'ethnic' actors enact roles in historical programmes to create the impression they have always been here, and children and unthinking adults sub consciously take this in.
The masses are diverted from reality by reality shows. These, coupled with a sophisticated conditioning campaign, ethnic minorities being shown positively in every advertisement, are lulling the population into believing that all in the garden is rosy when the threat to our civilisation is growing.
There is a photo showing Stephen Lawrence doing the black power fist but the establishment present him as a saint as they do Martin Luther King. Gang tribal wars are not helping. There is a huge amount of factual evidence that clearly shows the damage brought by immigrants to our society, but the moment a white British person mentions they are dehumanised by being labelled racist and persecuted.
There are no police checks on immigrants entering Britain , only when they commit a crime do the police check –it doesn't matter about the people who suffer at the hands of these criminals. The elites ignore our human rights.
A vehicle for mind altering is soaps. They present scenarios in which they play out the stereotypes of evil white racists and kindly, honest and capable blacks - constantly hammering home the ideology by auto-suggestion.
A perverted form is where young girls- who are avid TV watchers - are led astray by suggestions for how they should behave - what is acceptable in society, what is unacceptable. These "soaps" are supposed to reflect real life. The slime that is spewed out beggars belief.
TV teaches youngsters how to behave to be liked. There are programs to instruct you 'how to eat right, how to think right, how to exercise right, how to dress right and what sort of person is desirable.
TV also creates people’s belief of what is happening in the world. Eastenders some years ago showed two young white actresses mugging with violence a much respected elderly black actor, how often do you think this happens on our streets? I stopped watching TV because of how they portray the English. It is a revised-Marxist subversion of our values and traditions like our families and communities. All that gives our lives meaning must be destroyed for prospective multi racial utopia. Give up watching TV. It is easy: there are so many rewarding things to do, particularly with your children who need starting on the right path in this world of cultural elites corrupting the young.
The fact that the vast majority of racist violence is directed at whites is something which even the most brainwashed of liberals find difficult to refute so they keep it quiet.
The British crime survey 2006 shows that in the most serious categories of racial attacks- woundings and murders, out of 24,000 incidents, 20,000 were committed against whites. At the same time we are told we don't exist as a race. This Establishment ideology permeates everything while working towards a goal: to suppress, crush, humiliate, rob of identity, rob of respect and eradicate the true people of Britain - the new Kulak class!
Britain is reduced to warring tribes instead of a nation. As witnessed in towns and cities murder and stabbings are committed for no apparent reason. Most of these crimes are ethnic 'majorities' fighting for territory.
Reality differs vastly from the orthodox ideology that is propagandised. The importation of cheap labour from abroad puts our own people at a disadvantage but is hidden by the glossy Multi-Culti adverts. According to official statistics, one in five adults in Britain is out of work. These statistics reveal that there is well over 8 million people who are declared “economically inactive”, which is a record number according to the Office of National Statistics.
People who are labelled as “economically inactive” are students, the retired, parents who stay at home with children, the long term sick, and unsurprisingly, people who have simple given up looking for non-existent jobs. Before you get the wrong idea, the 8.05 million does not include the 2.46 million unemployed. When you add these together, it really puts things into perspective. Presently 21.2 per cent of the entire British adult population are out of work.
This revelation came as it was also claimed that the unemployment figure fell by 7,000 in the three months to November 2009, and now currently stands at 2.47 million.
In fact there are two main reasons why the figure has fallen: Firstly, people are becoming desperate and are willing to work for low pay and shorter hours to keep their jobs, which many families as a result will feel the impact of lower incomes for years to come, as a record breaking 1.03 million are working part time because it is impossible to secure full time work.
Secondly, the fall in unemployment is also a result of the rise in the “economically inactive” people, including school leavers who have chosen to go to college rather than spending many months looking for work which isn’t there.
And while the government try and improve their public image by boasting about the fall in unemployment families struggle on extremely low wages. What is even more worrying is that 27% of people who do have work, work in the public sector which is leading financial services at 16%.
The net increase in private sector jobs since 1997 is nil but 2.1 million jobs in the public sector were created, 1.2 million of which went to workers from overseas.
David Cox
Transferring Power to Others
We are living under in a tyranny and those with power and treat White Britons as something potentially dangerous and therefore in need of oppression, even dispossession. The attack on working class people for example is cultural as they financially propped up by welfare benefits; their mental needs with laid on entertainments – but there is a constant message that they are no good. The important thing is to learn who they are and where they belong and to value themselves. This is what has been called The Culture wars. It is the destruction of our traditional society for a plan of a global utopia. Its promoters see it as progress, liberation from past prejudices and restraints.
The fact is, this nation is being changed. It is becoming more Asian, West Indian, African etc. If the self-declared 'libertarians' and democracy lovers really think this country will be a pleasant place to live under these circumstances they are seriously deluded. All the evidence is there: inter-ethnic violence, voting fraud and commitment to political parties that look after their ethnic interests.
The selfish middle classes who adopted a morally superior attitude when the working classes were being pushed out now find their own children beginning to lose. Former Conservative MP George Walden wrote of how we are being replaced in “Immigration is Fine For the Rich”(Times of 5th November 2006):” We hadn’t got far in a Today programme discussion of my new book “Time to Emigrate?” … Slurs about racism I expected. Instead I was accused of favouring eugenics, a more original interpretation of my thesis, for which there is no evidence in the book… hinting that you are a neo-Nazi for raising the issue of excessive immigration is pushing it.
The previous day the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had announced some startling new figures: Britain was taking in 1,500 immigrants a day, while 1,000 Brits left. Which rather confirmed the central premise of my book: that more people were moving out as well as in, and that a growing number of emigrants — by no means necessarily racists — were quitting because of the numbers coming in.”
Migration Watch has had the truth revealed released official documentation. Whitehall has had to release papers revealing that labour implemented a secret plan to relax border controls to change Britain. A memo written for Blair in 2000, shows that the Government’s strategy was to “open up migration” so they could achieve “social objectives.” Ministers kept this hidden from the public.
Weakness and sentimentality got us in this mess. The young don't know it but they have been corrupted and weakened by emasculate talk of compassion and tolerance.
The new elites promote a version of progress and see the past as obsolete. Edmund Burke accurately summed these dreamers up: “ You think you are combating prejudice but you are at war with nature.”
The attitude of the current batch of moral and intellectual inferiors who control public life is to transfer power away from their descendents to rival communities.
To try and understand the mentality of the new elites who are having their own people pushed out look at Roy Hattersley’s article in The Guardian of 8 April 2005: “I took the votes of Birmingham Muslims for granted.” … But if, at any time between 1964 and 1997 I heard of a Khan, Saleem or Iqbal who did not support Labour I was both outraged and astonished. My presumption was justified. It was the Muslim vote - increased by an influx of families from Kashmir, the Punjab and other parts of Birmingham - which expanded my majority from barely 1,200 to more than 12,000.
... Back in Birmingham this week it was clear that the Khans, Saleems and Iqbals have developed a new - and more healthy - attitude towards politics... The change has not produced quite the results which the pundits anticipated. When I represented Sparkbrook, Mustaq's was a corner grocery shop. Now it is a huge glass and stainless steel emporium owned by Mustaq Food Machinery Limited - an international company which exports throughout Europe from its showroom on the other side of the road.
... Nobody to whom I spoke during my visit to Birmingham chose to talk about the postal vote rigging which had been exposed and condemned the previous day. Reaction to my own inquiries confirmed the reason for their reticence. The six corrupt councillors happened to be Muslim“. This is an aspect of “progressive” thinking. They split subject and form. In this case religion is separated from behaviour and work from worker. Work here is part of our inheritance as our ancestors created the industries and should be indivisible from British workers not treat the global populations as interchangeable.
That is a mix of self-interest and a failure to understand human nature. The ethnic minorities are not just abstract categories to be sentimentally labelled as “Victims” to be empowerd they are loyal to their people and are here to make it. What they do used to be done by our people. The authorities act as if the two are interchangeable. Why are we no longer doing it? We are losing our skills because the elites are selling our industries to foreign countries who when have our technology and will not want us.
When we inherited England we inherited the obligations and responsibilities not just the benefits and it is reprehensible to invite outsiders in to empower them while passing Race Laws to oppress White Britons. This deprives our descendents and leaves them without.
This involves deculturation which causes depression and a sense of futility. Nothing is worth doing. It turns the victim against his own people to get what they want that way instead of earning it because of the loss of self worth. We don’t belong, are out of place and fail to re-produce as we see no future. There are several ways this is effected – encouraging homosexuality, abortion and careerism. Nothing to strive for and this is happening increasingly to young people who have imported cheap labour to compete with and now the young middle classes as half the medical school graduates are Asian. It is the loss of energy and interest in life from the destruction of community and traditional roots.
It leads to escape in drink where they can feel important and fantasies compensate for our dispossession and reduced status and drugs to create an artificial refuge to numb reality. It is like a permanent state of dehumanisation as they feel unreal and need substances to give a sense of reality. Almost every day on public transport you can smell skunk wafting down from upstairs and see youngsters on recreation and waste ground drinking liquor bought from off licenses. There are not enough cultural links left to anchor people in their communities which they are being pushed out of by the attempt to destroy what we are. Immigration benefits those at the top who justify it with utopian ideals but destroys everyone else. Andrew Neather revealed that the elites did this deliberately and Cameron wants us to bring in Africans with aids! How they must hate White Britons to want to destroy them and put them t risk of killer diseases when there is no need. Cameron also wants indigenous people to adopt immigrants ways!
The immigrants have left their own countries and are replicating their culture here and our young are assimilating to it. They don’t know who or what they are and although most will grow out of it they have no real cultural community where they belong.
We have become preoccupied with diversion – non-stop entertainment all laid on an involving no personal creativity, inability to sustain relationships. The elites have introduced 24 hour drinking and super casinos to divert us and destroy us. The spiritual life has been replaced by abstract political ideologies; our way of life by artificial substitutes
We have basic needs like food, drink, air, shelter, but there are also emotional needs like secure bonds of affection and esteem within either immediate relationships and spiritual needs, the deep need to belong to a particular people sharing inherited genetic patterning of the mind which both produces a culture and needs it for sustenance. We live in it and it lives in us. This is known as a culture or civilisation and if deprived of this one becomes listless, aimless or hyperactive in the search for diversion
We are the products of this evolution in not only our own being but all around are extensions of us. Our towns, cities, villages and the countryside we visit. We are part of the same arrangement as the locals in those places. It is produced by our genes and then moulds the newborn giving them something of their own and somewhere to belong.
In cities like Birmingham and London indigenous people have no sense of community and seek substitutes in small groups in pubs which peer suspiciously at those they do not know. They have taken refuge in small groups of people who know each other. This is matched by the destruction of the family. For years the elites through both ruling parties have socially engineered this by such as tax incentives to single parents.
Young people form communities of type and this is encouraged by their favourite type of music to give them substitute identities because they don’t now what they are
The elites’ belief in Nazis is part of the moral understucture of the ruling ideology. It is how they soften us up to be taken over by immigrants. Our moral core is that we inherited a natural way of life and it has only been changed because it has been corrupted. Our strength is that this is ours by natural descent and was bequeathed to us naturally. This our tradition - not weakness in the face of danger excused as tolerance. It is our duty to maintain it - not a right or privilege.
We owe it to our ancestors out of reverence and owe it to future generations out of duty. Even if we do not personally like something such as folk music, we have a duty to preserve them. It is for each to do according to their capacities. It does not need justifying it is our natural birthright. We must not let others encroach upon our proprietorship as the weak are always overtaken by the strong. It is morally bad to willingly default on one’s duty to the descendents.
These are first principles and trump the liberal empiricism of letting anyone have a go as if they are interchangeable with us. This is alright in industry when they just want “hands” to do a job; but society is an organic growth not a utilitarian system. The organic society recognises other aspects of our natures not just “getting and spending.”
On 27 July 2005, BBC reporter Phil Mackie admitted on Radio 5 Brian Hayes 10 pm programme that the BBC censors the truth about Muslims and that the BBC is selective in its broadcasting of Muslim statements. The function of the media is to prepare the public for whatever measures the establishment plan to further the Muslim extremists’ interests.
The default position is anti-British and what was normal, healthy patriotism is now demonised as “far-right” and patriots are subject to slander and discrimination.
Home Secretary Roy Jenkins introduced race laws and the Soviet style agency of Inquisition, the forunner to The Equalities Commission, the Commission for Racial Equality to ensure preferential treatment for other racial groups over whites. Biographer John Campbell revealed that Jenkins believed: “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it.”
Home Office minister Beverley Hughes was found to be approving visa claims from Eastern Europe despite warnings they were using forged documents. Lin Homer was chief executive of Birmingham city council and presided over what investigator Judge Mawrey called “massive, systematic and organised fraud” in an election campaign. It made a mockery of the election and he ruled that not less than
1,500 votes had been cast fraudulently in the city. She was later appointed chief of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate.
The Government advertise in terrorist countries like Pakistan for immigrants to come here. In November 2006 a Foreign Office pamphlet advertised: “Multicultural Britain — A Land of Immigrants.” It stated that immigrants should immigrate here because of the Human Rights Act would protect them and well-paid jobs were available for them. The Foreign Office put the document “Ethnic Diversity” in British embassies across the world.
We have to get involved in every aspect of life - local organisations, folk societies, school governors and home schooling and start our own credit unions. We need to form committees like alternative councils with proper banking and verified officers and proper banking to counter having our communities taken off us.
Gypsies buy a field from a farmer, descend on it, get the concrete down then move in. It is a fait accompli. An idea was put forward in The Spectator of 17th December 2005 by conservative philosopher Roger Scruton: “Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm… If we wish to retain our countryside, it is up to us who live there to make the necessary sacrifices.” This applies to forming collectives to buy property in our towns and cities.
The ownership of land gives power to these rival communities. When the authorities bend he rules to allow them to take things off us they are allowing new people to take over. This is clearly shown in the territorial claim involved in building “Islamic Communities” as in Dudley and London. The authorities over ride local communities to give power and influence over them to immigrants by granting planning permission.
sara
The fact is, this nation is being changed. It is becoming more Asian, West Indian, African etc. If the self-declared 'libertarians' and democracy lovers really think this country will be a pleasant place to live under these circumstances they are seriously deluded. All the evidence is there: inter-ethnic violence, voting fraud and commitment to political parties that look after their ethnic interests.
The selfish middle classes who adopted a morally superior attitude when the working classes were being pushed out now find their own children beginning to lose. Former Conservative MP George Walden wrote of how we are being replaced in “Immigration is Fine For the Rich”(Times of 5th November 2006):” We hadn’t got far in a Today programme discussion of my new book “Time to Emigrate?” … Slurs about racism I expected. Instead I was accused of favouring eugenics, a more original interpretation of my thesis, for which there is no evidence in the book… hinting that you are a neo-Nazi for raising the issue of excessive immigration is pushing it.
The previous day the Office for National Statistics (ONS) had announced some startling new figures: Britain was taking in 1,500 immigrants a day, while 1,000 Brits left. Which rather confirmed the central premise of my book: that more people were moving out as well as in, and that a growing number of emigrants — by no means necessarily racists — were quitting because of the numbers coming in.”
Migration Watch has had the truth revealed released official documentation. Whitehall has had to release papers revealing that labour implemented a secret plan to relax border controls to change Britain. A memo written for Blair in 2000, shows that the Government’s strategy was to “open up migration” so they could achieve “social objectives.” Ministers kept this hidden from the public.
Weakness and sentimentality got us in this mess. The young don't know it but they have been corrupted and weakened by emasculate talk of compassion and tolerance.
The new elites promote a version of progress and see the past as obsolete. Edmund Burke accurately summed these dreamers up: “ You think you are combating prejudice but you are at war with nature.”
The attitude of the current batch of moral and intellectual inferiors who control public life is to transfer power away from their descendents to rival communities.
To try and understand the mentality of the new elites who are having their own people pushed out look at Roy Hattersley’s article in The Guardian of 8 April 2005: “I took the votes of Birmingham Muslims for granted.” … But if, at any time between 1964 and 1997 I heard of a Khan, Saleem or Iqbal who did not support Labour I was both outraged and astonished. My presumption was justified. It was the Muslim vote - increased by an influx of families from Kashmir, the Punjab and other parts of Birmingham - which expanded my majority from barely 1,200 to more than 12,000.
... Back in Birmingham this week it was clear that the Khans, Saleems and Iqbals have developed a new - and more healthy - attitude towards politics... The change has not produced quite the results which the pundits anticipated. When I represented Sparkbrook, Mustaq's was a corner grocery shop. Now it is a huge glass and stainless steel emporium owned by Mustaq Food Machinery Limited - an international company which exports throughout Europe from its showroom on the other side of the road.
... Nobody to whom I spoke during my visit to Birmingham chose to talk about the postal vote rigging which had been exposed and condemned the previous day. Reaction to my own inquiries confirmed the reason for their reticence. The six corrupt councillors happened to be Muslim“. This is an aspect of “progressive” thinking. They split subject and form. In this case religion is separated from behaviour and work from worker. Work here is part of our inheritance as our ancestors created the industries and should be indivisible from British workers not treat the global populations as interchangeable.
That is a mix of self-interest and a failure to understand human nature. The ethnic minorities are not just abstract categories to be sentimentally labelled as “Victims” to be empowerd they are loyal to their people and are here to make it. What they do used to be done by our people. The authorities act as if the two are interchangeable. Why are we no longer doing it? We are losing our skills because the elites are selling our industries to foreign countries who when have our technology and will not want us.
When we inherited England we inherited the obligations and responsibilities not just the benefits and it is reprehensible to invite outsiders in to empower them while passing Race Laws to oppress White Britons. This deprives our descendents and leaves them without.
This involves deculturation which causes depression and a sense of futility. Nothing is worth doing. It turns the victim against his own people to get what they want that way instead of earning it because of the loss of self worth. We don’t belong, are out of place and fail to re-produce as we see no future. There are several ways this is effected – encouraging homosexuality, abortion and careerism. Nothing to strive for and this is happening increasingly to young people who have imported cheap labour to compete with and now the young middle classes as half the medical school graduates are Asian. It is the loss of energy and interest in life from the destruction of community and traditional roots.
It leads to escape in drink where they can feel important and fantasies compensate for our dispossession and reduced status and drugs to create an artificial refuge to numb reality. It is like a permanent state of dehumanisation as they feel unreal and need substances to give a sense of reality. Almost every day on public transport you can smell skunk wafting down from upstairs and see youngsters on recreation and waste ground drinking liquor bought from off licenses. There are not enough cultural links left to anchor people in their communities which they are being pushed out of by the attempt to destroy what we are. Immigration benefits those at the top who justify it with utopian ideals but destroys everyone else. Andrew Neather revealed that the elites did this deliberately and Cameron wants us to bring in Africans with aids! How they must hate White Britons to want to destroy them and put them t risk of killer diseases when there is no need. Cameron also wants indigenous people to adopt immigrants ways!
The immigrants have left their own countries and are replicating their culture here and our young are assimilating to it. They don’t know who or what they are and although most will grow out of it they have no real cultural community where they belong.
We have become preoccupied with diversion – non-stop entertainment all laid on an involving no personal creativity, inability to sustain relationships. The elites have introduced 24 hour drinking and super casinos to divert us and destroy us. The spiritual life has been replaced by abstract political ideologies; our way of life by artificial substitutes
We have basic needs like food, drink, air, shelter, but there are also emotional needs like secure bonds of affection and esteem within either immediate relationships and spiritual needs, the deep need to belong to a particular people sharing inherited genetic patterning of the mind which both produces a culture and needs it for sustenance. We live in it and it lives in us. This is known as a culture or civilisation and if deprived of this one becomes listless, aimless or hyperactive in the search for diversion
We are the products of this evolution in not only our own being but all around are extensions of us. Our towns, cities, villages and the countryside we visit. We are part of the same arrangement as the locals in those places. It is produced by our genes and then moulds the newborn giving them something of their own and somewhere to belong.
In cities like Birmingham and London indigenous people have no sense of community and seek substitutes in small groups in pubs which peer suspiciously at those they do not know. They have taken refuge in small groups of people who know each other. This is matched by the destruction of the family. For years the elites through both ruling parties have socially engineered this by such as tax incentives to single parents.
Young people form communities of type and this is encouraged by their favourite type of music to give them substitute identities because they don’t now what they are
The elites’ belief in Nazis is part of the moral understucture of the ruling ideology. It is how they soften us up to be taken over by immigrants. Our moral core is that we inherited a natural way of life and it has only been changed because it has been corrupted. Our strength is that this is ours by natural descent and was bequeathed to us naturally. This our tradition - not weakness in the face of danger excused as tolerance. It is our duty to maintain it - not a right or privilege.
We owe it to our ancestors out of reverence and owe it to future generations out of duty. Even if we do not personally like something such as folk music, we have a duty to preserve them. It is for each to do according to their capacities. It does not need justifying it is our natural birthright. We must not let others encroach upon our proprietorship as the weak are always overtaken by the strong. It is morally bad to willingly default on one’s duty to the descendents.
These are first principles and trump the liberal empiricism of letting anyone have a go as if they are interchangeable with us. This is alright in industry when they just want “hands” to do a job; but society is an organic growth not a utilitarian system. The organic society recognises other aspects of our natures not just “getting and spending.”
On 27 July 2005, BBC reporter Phil Mackie admitted on Radio 5 Brian Hayes 10 pm programme that the BBC censors the truth about Muslims and that the BBC is selective in its broadcasting of Muslim statements. The function of the media is to prepare the public for whatever measures the establishment plan to further the Muslim extremists’ interests.
The default position is anti-British and what was normal, healthy patriotism is now demonised as “far-right” and patriots are subject to slander and discrimination.
Home Secretary Roy Jenkins introduced race laws and the Soviet style agency of Inquisition, the forunner to The Equalities Commission, the Commission for Racial Equality to ensure preferential treatment for other racial groups over whites. Biographer John Campbell revealed that Jenkins believed: “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it.”
Home Office minister Beverley Hughes was found to be approving visa claims from Eastern Europe despite warnings they were using forged documents. Lin Homer was chief executive of Birmingham city council and presided over what investigator Judge Mawrey called “massive, systematic and organised fraud” in an election campaign. It made a mockery of the election and he ruled that not less than
1,500 votes had been cast fraudulently in the city. She was later appointed chief of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate.
The Government advertise in terrorist countries like Pakistan for immigrants to come here. In November 2006 a Foreign Office pamphlet advertised: “Multicultural Britain — A Land of Immigrants.” It stated that immigrants should immigrate here because of the Human Rights Act would protect them and well-paid jobs were available for them. The Foreign Office put the document “Ethnic Diversity” in British embassies across the world.
We have to get involved in every aspect of life - local organisations, folk societies, school governors and home schooling and start our own credit unions. We need to form committees like alternative councils with proper banking and verified officers and proper banking to counter having our communities taken off us.
Gypsies buy a field from a farmer, descend on it, get the concrete down then move in. It is a fait accompli. An idea was put forward in The Spectator of 17th December 2005 by conservative philosopher Roger Scruton: “Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm… If we wish to retain our countryside, it is up to us who live there to make the necessary sacrifices.” This applies to forming collectives to buy property in our towns and cities.
The ownership of land gives power to these rival communities. When the authorities bend he rules to allow them to take things off us they are allowing new people to take over. This is clearly shown in the territorial claim involved in building “Islamic Communities” as in Dudley and London. The authorities over ride local communities to give power and influence over them to immigrants by granting planning permission.
sara
Lions and Foxes
Lions and Foxes
Why has a country that has fought so many heroic battles and been so honourable sunk to its current level of deceit, degeneracy and cowardice? Once noble warriors we have deteriorated to a senior military man General Sir David Richards launching The Armed Forces Muslim Association in October 2009, to “forge closer relationships with Islamic communities across the U.K.” Richards: was “delighted” and “honoured” to be its first Patron and said it will make a “huge value in raising awareness and mutual understanding” in the armed forces. He added that the Afma would help to recruit from the Muslim community. A senior General encouraging those who are at war with us to infiltrate our armed forces!
What were the wheels of decline? Why are we governed by liars, crooks and deceivers who are interested only in making money and clinging to power? Italian Sociologist, Vilfredo Pareto, clarified how this came about. In what follows I shall try to give an insight into how lying, manipulation and deceit are the contemporary methods of managing the population and am not necessarily expressing personal preferences or dislike of persons. Pareto is broadly right in his insights.
In his important book “The Triumph of the Political Class” on the immorality of contemporary politicians Peter Oborne uses the work on elites of Gaetano Mosca. Following Mosca Oborne sees power as vested in dominant elites in our society. I agree and do not think we are in a battle of ideas as some think but battles between groups. However, a dominant ideology, works like a like a dominant religion and people are promoted in society or held back by whether they conform or not and subjected to public Inquisition if they transgress as under Torquemada or Macpherson.
It also influences the type of people who rule or lose influence. Those who come to power promote their own kind and demote those who are different until the one type dominate. The “multi-racial or anti-rascist” ideology is crucial to whether individuals have influence or are removed from power and I call this an “ideological caste” because expressing the right opinions is crucial to obtaining and maintaining one’s position.
Pareto described how power-elites change and developed notions of how rulers change called “the Circulation of the Elites”.
In all societies including Democracies there is a class that rules and a class that is ruled. On weak rulers he wrote, " Any elite which is not prepared to join in battle to defend its position is in full decadence, and all that is left to it is to give way to another elite having the virile qualities it lacks. It is pure day-dreaming to imagine that the humanitarian principles it may have proclaimed will be applied to it. The knife of the guillotine was being sharpened in the shadows when, at the end of the eighteenth century, the ruling classes in France were engrossed in developing their’ sensibility.”
There are two types of ruler - “Lions and Foxes.” This originated in Machievelli’s “The Prince”. Machievelli was formulating a rationalist plan of “how to rule” for new rulers who had no tradition to guide them. He advised the new ruler to be half beast and half man: “So, as a Prince is forced to know how to act like a beast, he should learn from the fox and the lion; because the lion is defenceless against traps and a fox is defenceless against wolves. Therefore one must be a fox in order to recognise traps, and a lion to frighten off wolves.”
The Lions have what Pareto termed Class 11 residues of “Group Persistence”. They have a sense of objectivity and permanence and believe in family, property, nation, church and tradition. They are cautious in economics and value saving and “sound money.” They esteem character and duty over education and wealth and will use force to uphold their values. They rely on their strength, stubbornness.
Foxes, tend to work in the talking professions like journalism or the law, and live by their wits, shrewdness, deceit and fraud.
Pareto added Residues. There are six classes of Residues but the first two are relevant to our era. Class 1 residue is the foxes’ instinct for “combination”. They tend to manipulate words and construct abstruse theories and ideologies. They do not have strong attachment to Church, family, nation or tradition but can exploit these loyalties in others. They are creative in economics and politics and promote change and novelty. They do not plan far ahead and do not look to a great future for their people. They rely on their wits to thwart challenges and ad lib answers to questions.
A feature of Foxes is their distaste for the Martial and a preference for Economics. Our defences are severely cut back and the elites act as if we are in a safe world and have no enemies and think they can buy everyone off with aid and good will both here and abroad!
The dominant anti-British tendency and favouritism for “the other” can be traced to well-named Charles James Fox and his type down to the present. He exhibited the Foxes tendency for abstractions and high-sounding ideals which is evident from his support for the principles of the French Revolution while ignoring the reality. He regarded our war with France as an attempt to crush a noble experiment in human liberty. In 1786 he said of the Rohilla charge,” by those laws which are to be found in Europe, Africa, and Asia – that are found among all mankind, those principles of Equity and humanity implanted in our hearts which have their existence in the feelings of mankind …”
Why then do things not stay the same? Why are we decadent and longer capable of defending ourselves? Modernist art critic Herbert Read wrote in “Form in Modern Poetry” that the nature of men had changed from character to personality. Character being permanent, solid traits; personality more fluid and changeable.
Pareto suggests that there is a “Circulation of Elites.” The ruling elites are not a stable ruling class but changing. Pareto thought this circulation occurs because each type has inherent weaknesses. Thus whilst the Lions' act forcefully they lack imagination and cunning; conversely, Foxes possess cunning but fail to act coercively. Examples are the police negotiating for too long instead of shooting the criminals, kidnappers etc. Pareto disputed that democracy was a progressive form of government; it was, he said, another form of elite rule. A topical insight was that foxes often ignore invasions until it is too late. We should know. We are living through one!
The radical MP Samuel Whitbread was even more anti-British than Fox and excused the French while denouncing his own people. It was the dawning of our era when abstractions were coming to dominate and practical thinking was losing ground. Heroes like Nelson and Wellington were still at that time “role models” for young men, for their quiet manly courage, selflessness and high sense of duty. On the French Revolution Edmund Burke foresaw the decline of Lions’ values: “It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that charity of honour, which felt stain like a wound…The age of chivalry is gone. The age of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded.”
The Duke of Wellington was a famous lion. Like Churchill Wellington had been uninterested in education as a schoolboy. He shows the characteristics of a Lion.
He was at the Congress of Vienna when Napoleon returned from Elba but sent to command the Allied armies in the Netherlands, where he cooperated with the Prussian general von Blücher. Wellington was surprised by Marshal Ney at Quatre Bras and fell back on Waterloo, where he held on until Blücher came to his aid after the Prussian defeat at Ligny. Wellington won one of the most decisive battles in history. He was respected by his troops, who admired his composure under fire and his successes were due to his study of war, careful planning including supply, and realism. He defeated by Foxes Cobden and Bright who promoted free trade to bring about world peace. In 1846, the year The Corn Laws were repealled, Cobden said” I believe that the physical gain will be the smallest gain to humanity from the success of this principle. I look farther; I see in the Free Trade principle that which shall act on the moral world as the principle of gravitation in the universe – drawing men together , thrusting aside the antagonism of race, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.” The Victorian historian James Anthony Froude lamented that we had chosen economics over duty as Foxes were taking over from lions and this can be traced through the century as economics replaced values like “nobility”, “duty” and “honour”.
It was Disraeli who turned the Conservatives into an opportunistic party from one of tradition. Disraeli was apparently determined to obtain independent means, and speculated on the stock exchange as early as 1824 on various South American mining companies he was a progressive Tory and only nominally a Conservative and was sympathetic to some Chartists demands and argued for an alliance between the landed aristocracy and the working class against the increasing power of the middle class. He was a founder of the Young England group in 1842 to promote the view that the rich should use their power to protect the poor from exploitation by the middle class. During the twenty years which separated the Corn Laws and the Second Reform Bill Disraeli sought Tory-Radical alliances though unsuccessfully. His rival Gladstone a Fox, was opposed to General Gordon, who expressed the values of lions in his journal about “honour to his country”.
Lord Kitchener was worshipped by the public but attacked in the Commons as a “butcher” and “Imperialist” by foxes and then pushed out of the War Cabinet by Lloyd George who formed the War Committee, which had dictatorial powers and took over the running of the war. A reformer, Lloyd George also out-manoeuvered and replaced General Sir William Robertson, Chief of the Imperial Staff with one of his own kind, Sir Henry Wilson, who wrote more of the balls he attended and the dignitaries he met than anything honourable or noble. Robertson was forced to resign on 11 February 1918, taking the lesser role of Commander-in-Chief of the British Home Forces (replacing Sir John French). Wilson had connived with Lloyd George to create the Supreme War Council which Robertson had vociferously opposed.
Robertson is the only man in history to rise to Field Marshall from private.
A staunch supporter of Sir Douglas Haig, Robertson acted to prevent Lloyd George's attempts to divert effort from the Western to the Eastern Front; unlike Lloyd George, Robertson was a keen 'Westerner', believing that the war could only be won on the Western Front.
In “Soldiers and Statesman 1914 –1916” (1926) Robertson repeatedly stresses “duty”. He highlighted the anti military bias of Foxes when he wrote of how Lloyd George and his war cabinet took a private house to seclude themselves from the Generals “where they sit twice a day and occupy their whole time with military policy, which is my job; a little body of politicians quite ignorant of war and all its needs, are trying to run the war themselves.”
Stanley Baldwin turned the Conservative party from imperialism to offering inducements to voters such as “houses” and “prosperity”. A century of disarmament, on both sides of the Commons, when old Tories spent their time preaching appeasement and dozing in London clubs while Socialists had fantasies about Internationalism, disarmament and submitting to the League of Nations when we were the most powerful country – left us weak and nearly defenceless.
Before being removed or nullified The Lions were first “Stigmatised”. The Lion Churchill spent a decade in slandered obscurity as a “Warmonger” before being needed to fend off Wolves. A Lion called Enoch was sacked from the shadow cabinet by arch-Fox Heath, who has since admitted misleading Parliament and thus the people into the federal state of Europe, which he claimed was merely a trading arrangement. Fox John Major deceived us when he pretended that we retained control over our borders after his legal advisors had advised him that had been signed away at Maastricht.
We have constant moral outrages such as Blair’s infamous sending our troops to war on a lie and his habitual lying to the population. Michael Howard campaigned for election on immigration control when he knew that the European Union would not allow him to implement his plans even had he meant to do so. In June 2004 it was revealed he is an investor in communications firm Incepta. A subsidiary company Citigate Lloyd Northover won 2 Home Office contracts to develop Websites and communications technology to speed up applications from immigrants to enter the UK. The company also gained from the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website for the Government to facilitate admission and settling of asylum seekers.
Parato’s world has deteriorated even more to our time. He wrote:
"The plutocracy has invented countless makeshift programs, such as generating enormous public debt that plutocrats know they will never be able to repay, levies on capital, taxes which exhaust the incomes of those who do not speculate... The principal goal of each of these measures is to deceive the multitudes."
When a society's system of values deteriorates to the point where hard work is denigrated and "easy money" extolled, where authority gives way to anarchy and justice to legal chicanery, such a society stands face to face with ruin.”
"It is a specific trait of weak governments. Among the causes of the weakness two especially are to be noted: humanitarianism and cowardice - the cowardice that comes natural to decadent aristocracies and is in part natural, in part calculated, in "speculator" governments that are primarily concerned with material gain. The humanitarian spirit ... is a malady peculiar to spineless individuals who are richly endowed with certain Class I residues that they have dressed up in sentimental garb."
Should the great Dead White Male Geoffrey Chaucer return to us he would behold not a Parliament of Fowls, but a Parliament of Foxes.
(1) The Triumph of the Political Class. Peter Oborne (Pocket Books) 2008
For corruption and deceit in the global media see:
“Flat Earth News by Nick Davies (Chatto & Windus) 2008
Pareto's most famous work is: “Mind & Society” which was published in 1916
http://www.bolenderinitiatives.com/sociology/vilfredo-pareto-1848-1923/vilfredo-pareto-theory-elites-and-circulation-elites
http://media.pfeiffer.edu/lridener/courses/CIRCELIT.HTML
Why has a country that has fought so many heroic battles and been so honourable sunk to its current level of deceit, degeneracy and cowardice? Once noble warriors we have deteriorated to a senior military man General Sir David Richards launching The Armed Forces Muslim Association in October 2009, to “forge closer relationships with Islamic communities across the U.K.” Richards: was “delighted” and “honoured” to be its first Patron and said it will make a “huge value in raising awareness and mutual understanding” in the armed forces. He added that the Afma would help to recruit from the Muslim community. A senior General encouraging those who are at war with us to infiltrate our armed forces!
What were the wheels of decline? Why are we governed by liars, crooks and deceivers who are interested only in making money and clinging to power? Italian Sociologist, Vilfredo Pareto, clarified how this came about. In what follows I shall try to give an insight into how lying, manipulation and deceit are the contemporary methods of managing the population and am not necessarily expressing personal preferences or dislike of persons. Pareto is broadly right in his insights.
In his important book “The Triumph of the Political Class” on the immorality of contemporary politicians Peter Oborne uses the work on elites of Gaetano Mosca. Following Mosca Oborne sees power as vested in dominant elites in our society. I agree and do not think we are in a battle of ideas as some think but battles between groups. However, a dominant ideology, works like a like a dominant religion and people are promoted in society or held back by whether they conform or not and subjected to public Inquisition if they transgress as under Torquemada or Macpherson.
It also influences the type of people who rule or lose influence. Those who come to power promote their own kind and demote those who are different until the one type dominate. The “multi-racial or anti-rascist” ideology is crucial to whether individuals have influence or are removed from power and I call this an “ideological caste” because expressing the right opinions is crucial to obtaining and maintaining one’s position.
Pareto described how power-elites change and developed notions of how rulers change called “the Circulation of the Elites”.
In all societies including Democracies there is a class that rules and a class that is ruled. On weak rulers he wrote, " Any elite which is not prepared to join in battle to defend its position is in full decadence, and all that is left to it is to give way to another elite having the virile qualities it lacks. It is pure day-dreaming to imagine that the humanitarian principles it may have proclaimed will be applied to it. The knife of the guillotine was being sharpened in the shadows when, at the end of the eighteenth century, the ruling classes in France were engrossed in developing their’ sensibility.”
There are two types of ruler - “Lions and Foxes.” This originated in Machievelli’s “The Prince”. Machievelli was formulating a rationalist plan of “how to rule” for new rulers who had no tradition to guide them. He advised the new ruler to be half beast and half man: “So, as a Prince is forced to know how to act like a beast, he should learn from the fox and the lion; because the lion is defenceless against traps and a fox is defenceless against wolves. Therefore one must be a fox in order to recognise traps, and a lion to frighten off wolves.”
The Lions have what Pareto termed Class 11 residues of “Group Persistence”. They have a sense of objectivity and permanence and believe in family, property, nation, church and tradition. They are cautious in economics and value saving and “sound money.” They esteem character and duty over education and wealth and will use force to uphold their values. They rely on their strength, stubbornness.
Foxes, tend to work in the talking professions like journalism or the law, and live by their wits, shrewdness, deceit and fraud.
Pareto added Residues. There are six classes of Residues but the first two are relevant to our era. Class 1 residue is the foxes’ instinct for “combination”. They tend to manipulate words and construct abstruse theories and ideologies. They do not have strong attachment to Church, family, nation or tradition but can exploit these loyalties in others. They are creative in economics and politics and promote change and novelty. They do not plan far ahead and do not look to a great future for their people. They rely on their wits to thwart challenges and ad lib answers to questions.
A feature of Foxes is their distaste for the Martial and a preference for Economics. Our defences are severely cut back and the elites act as if we are in a safe world and have no enemies and think they can buy everyone off with aid and good will both here and abroad!
The dominant anti-British tendency and favouritism for “the other” can be traced to well-named Charles James Fox and his type down to the present. He exhibited the Foxes tendency for abstractions and high-sounding ideals which is evident from his support for the principles of the French Revolution while ignoring the reality. He regarded our war with France as an attempt to crush a noble experiment in human liberty. In 1786 he said of the Rohilla charge,” by those laws which are to be found in Europe, Africa, and Asia – that are found among all mankind, those principles of Equity and humanity implanted in our hearts which have their existence in the feelings of mankind …”
Why then do things not stay the same? Why are we decadent and longer capable of defending ourselves? Modernist art critic Herbert Read wrote in “Form in Modern Poetry” that the nature of men had changed from character to personality. Character being permanent, solid traits; personality more fluid and changeable.
Pareto suggests that there is a “Circulation of Elites.” The ruling elites are not a stable ruling class but changing. Pareto thought this circulation occurs because each type has inherent weaknesses. Thus whilst the Lions' act forcefully they lack imagination and cunning; conversely, Foxes possess cunning but fail to act coercively. Examples are the police negotiating for too long instead of shooting the criminals, kidnappers etc. Pareto disputed that democracy was a progressive form of government; it was, he said, another form of elite rule. A topical insight was that foxes often ignore invasions until it is too late. We should know. We are living through one!
The radical MP Samuel Whitbread was even more anti-British than Fox and excused the French while denouncing his own people. It was the dawning of our era when abstractions were coming to dominate and practical thinking was losing ground. Heroes like Nelson and Wellington were still at that time “role models” for young men, for their quiet manly courage, selflessness and high sense of duty. On the French Revolution Edmund Burke foresaw the decline of Lions’ values: “It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that charity of honour, which felt stain like a wound…The age of chivalry is gone. The age of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded.”
The Duke of Wellington was a famous lion. Like Churchill Wellington had been uninterested in education as a schoolboy. He shows the characteristics of a Lion.
He was at the Congress of Vienna when Napoleon returned from Elba but sent to command the Allied armies in the Netherlands, where he cooperated with the Prussian general von Blücher. Wellington was surprised by Marshal Ney at Quatre Bras and fell back on Waterloo, where he held on until Blücher came to his aid after the Prussian defeat at Ligny. Wellington won one of the most decisive battles in history. He was respected by his troops, who admired his composure under fire and his successes were due to his study of war, careful planning including supply, and realism. He defeated by Foxes Cobden and Bright who promoted free trade to bring about world peace. In 1846, the year The Corn Laws were repealled, Cobden said” I believe that the physical gain will be the smallest gain to humanity from the success of this principle. I look farther; I see in the Free Trade principle that which shall act on the moral world as the principle of gravitation in the universe – drawing men together , thrusting aside the antagonism of race, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.” The Victorian historian James Anthony Froude lamented that we had chosen economics over duty as Foxes were taking over from lions and this can be traced through the century as economics replaced values like “nobility”, “duty” and “honour”.
It was Disraeli who turned the Conservatives into an opportunistic party from one of tradition. Disraeli was apparently determined to obtain independent means, and speculated on the stock exchange as early as 1824 on various South American mining companies he was a progressive Tory and only nominally a Conservative and was sympathetic to some Chartists demands and argued for an alliance between the landed aristocracy and the working class against the increasing power of the middle class. He was a founder of the Young England group in 1842 to promote the view that the rich should use their power to protect the poor from exploitation by the middle class. During the twenty years which separated the Corn Laws and the Second Reform Bill Disraeli sought Tory-Radical alliances though unsuccessfully. His rival Gladstone a Fox, was opposed to General Gordon, who expressed the values of lions in his journal about “honour to his country”.
Lord Kitchener was worshipped by the public but attacked in the Commons as a “butcher” and “Imperialist” by foxes and then pushed out of the War Cabinet by Lloyd George who formed the War Committee, which had dictatorial powers and took over the running of the war. A reformer, Lloyd George also out-manoeuvered and replaced General Sir William Robertson, Chief of the Imperial Staff with one of his own kind, Sir Henry Wilson, who wrote more of the balls he attended and the dignitaries he met than anything honourable or noble. Robertson was forced to resign on 11 February 1918, taking the lesser role of Commander-in-Chief of the British Home Forces (replacing Sir John French). Wilson had connived with Lloyd George to create the Supreme War Council which Robertson had vociferously opposed.
Robertson is the only man in history to rise to Field Marshall from private.
A staunch supporter of Sir Douglas Haig, Robertson acted to prevent Lloyd George's attempts to divert effort from the Western to the Eastern Front; unlike Lloyd George, Robertson was a keen 'Westerner', believing that the war could only be won on the Western Front.
In “Soldiers and Statesman 1914 –1916” (1926) Robertson repeatedly stresses “duty”. He highlighted the anti military bias of Foxes when he wrote of how Lloyd George and his war cabinet took a private house to seclude themselves from the Generals “where they sit twice a day and occupy their whole time with military policy, which is my job; a little body of politicians quite ignorant of war and all its needs, are trying to run the war themselves.”
Stanley Baldwin turned the Conservative party from imperialism to offering inducements to voters such as “houses” and “prosperity”. A century of disarmament, on both sides of the Commons, when old Tories spent their time preaching appeasement and dozing in London clubs while Socialists had fantasies about Internationalism, disarmament and submitting to the League of Nations when we were the most powerful country – left us weak and nearly defenceless.
Before being removed or nullified The Lions were first “Stigmatised”. The Lion Churchill spent a decade in slandered obscurity as a “Warmonger” before being needed to fend off Wolves. A Lion called Enoch was sacked from the shadow cabinet by arch-Fox Heath, who has since admitted misleading Parliament and thus the people into the federal state of Europe, which he claimed was merely a trading arrangement. Fox John Major deceived us when he pretended that we retained control over our borders after his legal advisors had advised him that had been signed away at Maastricht.
We have constant moral outrages such as Blair’s infamous sending our troops to war on a lie and his habitual lying to the population. Michael Howard campaigned for election on immigration control when he knew that the European Union would not allow him to implement his plans even had he meant to do so. In June 2004 it was revealed he is an investor in communications firm Incepta. A subsidiary company Citigate Lloyd Northover won 2 Home Office contracts to develop Websites and communications technology to speed up applications from immigrants to enter the UK. The company also gained from the Immigration and Nationality Directorate website for the Government to facilitate admission and settling of asylum seekers.
Parato’s world has deteriorated even more to our time. He wrote:
"The plutocracy has invented countless makeshift programs, such as generating enormous public debt that plutocrats know they will never be able to repay, levies on capital, taxes which exhaust the incomes of those who do not speculate... The principal goal of each of these measures is to deceive the multitudes."
When a society's system of values deteriorates to the point where hard work is denigrated and "easy money" extolled, where authority gives way to anarchy and justice to legal chicanery, such a society stands face to face with ruin.”
"It is a specific trait of weak governments. Among the causes of the weakness two especially are to be noted: humanitarianism and cowardice - the cowardice that comes natural to decadent aristocracies and is in part natural, in part calculated, in "speculator" governments that are primarily concerned with material gain. The humanitarian spirit ... is a malady peculiar to spineless individuals who are richly endowed with certain Class I residues that they have dressed up in sentimental garb."
Should the great Dead White Male Geoffrey Chaucer return to us he would behold not a Parliament of Fowls, but a Parliament of Foxes.
(1) The Triumph of the Political Class. Peter Oborne (Pocket Books) 2008
For corruption and deceit in the global media see:
“Flat Earth News by Nick Davies (Chatto & Windus) 2008
Pareto's most famous work is: “Mind & Society” which was published in 1916
http://www.bolenderinitiatives.com/sociology/vilfredo-pareto-1848-1923/vilfredo-pareto-theory-elites-and-circulation-elites
http://media.pfeiffer.edu/lridener/courses/CIRCELIT.HTML
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
